지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 동양사학회 동양사학연구 東洋史學硏究 第131輯
- 발행연도
- 2015.6
- 수록면
- 233 - 278 (46page)
- DOI
- 10.17856/jahs.2015.06.131.233
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study examined the “issues of Imna (任那)” which emerged after the fall of Imna. Existing studies have focused on the “Tribute of Imna (任那の調)”. However, for the “issues of Imna”, which were not based on real history, the relevant issues should be dealt with comprehensively, including the events of dispatching “Imna envoy (任那使)” and sending a military force, in addition to the “Tribute of Imna”.
This paper aimed to make it clear that the issues of Imna are neither mere symbolic issues nor realistic relations with the Korean Peninsula, but are directly related to the royal family of the Yamato Dynasty. From the establishment of the “Tribute of Imna” to its abolishment, the “issues of Imna” emerged during the rule of each Japanese emperor, exhibiting certain regularity. This indicates that the “issues of Imna” were closely related to succession to the great king"s throne in the Yamato Dynasty. Therefore, the Yamato Dynasty attempted to show off the royal authority of the great king, who was the king of Jebeon (諸蕃), through a so-called ceremonial revival of Imna by having “Imnasa” visit from Silla and performing the “Tribute of Imna”, which was a ritual of donation to the palace, in the royal court of the Yamato Dynasty. This policy to revive Imna was formed in the sixth century and was intensively promoted until the seventh century. This was established as a principle for succession to the great king"s throne, which the great kings in the line of Heummyeong (欽明係) were obliged to adhere to. After the Taika Reform by which the change from the great king to the emperor had been made, this policy lost its characteristic as a principle for succession to the great king"s throne. As least in the sixth century, the Yamato Dynasty perceived Imna (or Geumgwan Gaya) as “Miyake (屯倉)”. For this reason, the region"s revival was the most important task for the great king"s royal family and was a huge project that had to be carried over from the great king to the crown prince. As this shows, the great kings in the line of Heummyeong during the sixth century endeavored to seize power in Bumin (部民) and Dunchang (屯倉: Miyake), and Bumin and Dunchang were expanded into their symbolic meanings that the great king"s royal family had to carry beyond their realistic meanings. This led to the emergence of the perception that “Imna equals Dunchang (Miyake)”, and the perception came to lose its driving force as a principle for succession to the throne along with the effective abolishment of Bu (部) and Dunchang (屯倉).
This paper aimed to make it clear that the issues of Imna are neither mere symbolic issues nor realistic relations with the Korean Peninsula, but are directly related to the royal family of the Yamato Dynasty. From the establishment of the “Tribute of Imna” to its abolishment, the “issues of Imna” emerged during the rule of each Japanese emperor, exhibiting certain regularity. This indicates that the “issues of Imna” were closely related to succession to the great king"s throne in the Yamato Dynasty. Therefore, the Yamato Dynasty attempted to show off the royal authority of the great king, who was the king of Jebeon (諸蕃), through a so-called ceremonial revival of Imna by having “Imnasa” visit from Silla and performing the “Tribute of Imna”, which was a ritual of donation to the palace, in the royal court of the Yamato Dynasty. This policy to revive Imna was formed in the sixth century and was intensively promoted until the seventh century. This was established as a principle for succession to the great king"s throne, which the great kings in the line of Heummyeong (欽明係) were obliged to adhere to. After the Taika Reform by which the change from the great king to the emperor had been made, this policy lost its characteristic as a principle for succession to the great king"s throne. As least in the sixth century, the Yamato Dynasty perceived Imna (or Geumgwan Gaya) as “Miyake (屯倉)”. For this reason, the region"s revival was the most important task for the great king"s royal family and was a huge project that had to be carried over from the great king to the crown prince. As this shows, the great kings in the line of Heummyeong during the sixth century endeavored to seize power in Bumin (部民) and Dunchang (屯倉: Miyake), and Bumin and Dunchang were expanded into their symbolic meanings that the great king"s royal family had to carry beyond their realistic meanings. This led to the emergence of the perception that “Imna equals Dunchang (Miyake)”, and the perception came to lose its driving force as a principle for succession to the throne along with the effective abolishment of Bu (部) and Dunchang (屯倉).
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 연구사와 문제소재의 검토
Ⅲ. 흠명계의 성립과 대왕계승원리의 형성
Ⅳ. 흠명계의 대왕계승과 임나문제
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (24)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
任那日本府 연구의 허상과 실상
문물연구
2024 .05
-
屯倉과 韓國木簡 -倭國史에서의 韓國木簡의 가능성-
목간과문자
2019 .06
-
식민주의 역사학의 연속과 불연속 - 고대 한일관계에 대한 스에마쓰 야스카즈(末松保和)의 논의를 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2024 .09
-
『任那興亡史』의 논지와 학술적 영향에 대한 비판적 검토
한일관계사연구
2019 .05
-
한국고대사 시대 설정에서의 가야사 위상 정립을 위한 시론적 논의
사림
2023 .01
-
Next of “King”
Localities
2016 .11
-
일본 중등 역사교과서의 임나일본부설
백제문화
2018 .01
-
임나일본부설의 역사학
동북아역사논총
2016 .09
-
태평양 전쟁기 해군혼(海軍魂)의 탄생과 전파
日本學硏究
2024 .01
-
창 내고자 창을 내고자
수필미학
2020 .09
-
세종실록을 통해 본왕세자(문종) 교육의 특징
역사교육논집
2019 .01
-
임나강역고-쓰다 소키치(津田左右吉), 「任那疆域考」 『朝鮮歷史地理』 第1卷(歷史調査報告 第2), 南滿洲鐵道株式會社, 1913
인문학연구
2016 .01
-
조선의 冕服: 정치와 외교의 修辭
역사민속학
2022 .06
-
任那日本府 사료의 세계와 日本史學
한국고대사연구
2018 .09
-
최치원 찬술 신라 국왕 表文의 작성 시기와 배경
신라사학보
2022 .12
-
일본고대국가와 백제계 도래인 : 특히, 백제계 문필(史姓)씨족의 활동과 역할을 중심으로
한일관계사연구
2015 .12
-
위덕왕대 사찰 조영을 통해 본 왕권의 변동과 왕제 혜
역사와 담론
2023 .04
-
6세기 왜계백제관인을 통해 본 백제-왜 관계의 변화
역사와현실
2018 .09
-
조선후기 ‘대리정치’의 권한 범주와 왕권
역사와 담론
2018 .01
-
이슬람, 문화의 창으로 볼 것인가? 페미니즘의 창으로 볼 것인가?
종교문화연구
2015 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0