지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article discussed, in the view of the right to the relational growth and development, that how the boy prisoner will has to be treated at the bar.
Firstly, the judiciary proceeding for growth and development of the crime boy are the juvenile protection procedure as a rule. And the criminal trial process is nothing but the temporary exceptional measure for the political compromise. It has to grasp in the broad principle of the criminal judicature about the boy to liberate one boy suspect · defendant in which the detective trial process is institutionalized on the law as the procedure where it has the juvenile protection procedure and mutual cyclic from the procedural burden in the first stage and return to the boy judiciary proceeding, that is the principle procedure.
And it is exceedingly exceptional but the procedure of criminal cases about the boy has to be materially managed in one and procedure of criminal cases where the criminal case judiciary proceeding is clearly applied based on the relational growth and development. That is, the detective trial process has to be done with the private. The operation of the process of a trial has to Kindly and affably do like the boy referee. the court is considered the emotion of the boy prisoner and is able to leave the bar.
Article 50 of the Juvenile Act has to have the function under an appeal of dissatisfaction in the decision to Article 7 of the rules of the Juvenile Act, therefore the court has to judge not at the discretionary but necessarily about that fitness. The investigation of witness about the society record of investigation, in the transfer determination, has to be conducted in the fact investigation of Article 43 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Act.
Moreover, since the criminal punishment about the boy has to be abolished, there is no need to discuss the determination of punishment. However, as the next best thing in case of being based on the current criminal trial, it has the meaning to examine the adequacy of the determination of punishment in the view of the right to the relational growth and development.
Firstly, the judiciary proceeding for growth and development of the crime boy are the juvenile protection procedure as a rule. And the criminal trial process is nothing but the temporary exceptional measure for the political compromise. It has to grasp in the broad principle of the criminal judicature about the boy to liberate one boy suspect · defendant in which the detective trial process is institutionalized on the law as the procedure where it has the juvenile protection procedure and mutual cyclic from the procedural burden in the first stage and return to the boy judiciary proceeding, that is the principle procedure.
And it is exceedingly exceptional but the procedure of criminal cases about the boy has to be materially managed in one and procedure of criminal cases where the criminal case judiciary proceeding is clearly applied based on the relational growth and development. That is, the detective trial process has to be done with the private. The operation of the process of a trial has to Kindly and affably do like the boy referee. the court is considered the emotion of the boy prisoner and is able to leave the bar.
Article 50 of the Juvenile Act has to have the function under an appeal of dissatisfaction in the decision to Article 7 of the rules of the Juvenile Act, therefore the court has to judge not at the discretionary but necessarily about that fitness. The investigation of witness about the society record of investigation, in the transfer determination, has to be conducted in the fact investigation of Article 43 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Act.
Moreover, since the criminal punishment about the boy has to be abolished, there is no need to discuss the determination of punishment. However, as the next best thing in case of being based on the current criminal trial, it has the meaning to examine the adequacy of the determination of punishment in the view of the right to the relational growth and development.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 형사소송목적의 재구성
Ⅲ. 범죄소년에 대한 형사재판의 기본방향
Ⅳ. 소년법 제50조(송치)의 기본방향
Ⅴ. 소년조사기록(사회기록) 취급의 기본방향
Ⅵ. 나오는 말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (19)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
엄벌화의 길로 들어선 일본 개정 소년법 - 그 주요내용과 우리의 개정방향 -
법이론실무연구
2023 .02
-
중국 소년사법제도의 문제점 및 개선방안
한양법학
2020 .05
-
소년범에 대한 벌금형 선고의 문제점과 보호처분으로 대체의 당위성에 대한 고찰
한양법학
2017 .05
-
소년범에 대한 형벌 부과의 문제점 및 개선방안
비교형사법연구
2018 .01
-
소년의 법률조력을 받을 권리와 보조인 제도의 재조명
형사법연구
2020 .01
-
소년사법의 개선방안에 관한 연구
법학연구
2016 .01
-
소년강력범죄의 사전 대응에 관한 소고
한양법학
2019 .02
-
Criminal Procedure of Korea
Journal of Korean Law
2024 .02
-
소년사법 개선 및 소년법 개정 논의의 쟁점과 평가
보호관찰
2017 .01
-
소년범의 형사처벌 강화 입법 논의에 관한 비판적 고찰
법과 정책연구
2024 .03
-
헌법합치적 소년사법제도에 대한 구상
헌법학연구
2022 .09
-
형사처벌 대상자의 연령인하와 치유사법에 관한 고찰
법학연구
2016 .01
-
소년사법에서 국제기준의 국내이행방안
교정담론
2017 .01
-
일본의 소년법제와 소년범죄 대응에 관한 분석적 연구
소년보호연구
2024 .06
-
형사절차상 소년범 구속제도의 개선방안
법과 정책연구
2022 .03
-
미국 소년사법절차상 검사직접소추의 현황과 평가
법학논총
2015 .01
-
국친사상의 변화와 소년법 보호처분절차의 개선방향
비교사법
2022 .11
-
독일의 소년범죄 대응 현황 및 그 시사점
소년보호연구
2024 .06
-
소년법상 우범소년 규정의 개선과 우범소년에 대한 법교육에 관한 고찰
법학연구
2017 .01
-
경찰의 청소년 선도 및 보호 프로그램 개선방안에 관한 연구
비교법연구
2021 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-360-002711460