지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Previous studies in Korea, which examined either the Dang’s ruling of the old Goguryeo territory or the nature of the Andong Doho-bu unit, had the tendency of highlighting what was different in Goguryeo’s case and how the Goguryeo refugees fought Dang while maintaining their independent identity. In such process, examination of how the Dang government actually governed the former Goguryeo territory, in extension of its own universal policy toward subjugated nearby races, unintentionally left many things to be desired. Examined in this article is how the Dang dynasty’s general stance toward alien races - which it maintained during the early half of its very existence- was applied to the Goguryeo situation, and what kind of mishaps occurred. Added to written texts, tomb epitaphs that had been generated during the Dang era are especially consulted.
The Dang government had vibrant discussions over the issue of what direction should be taken by such policy, especially in the process of dealing with surrendered Turk households. And Dang’s ruling of Goguryeo initially did not escape the confines of such discussions. But Dang’s such Gimi-buju governing policy met with severe resistance by the former Goguryeo citizens in the very early stage. As a result, the Dang policy was not able to function as expected. Goguryeo influentials (fortress lords) who had collaborated with Dang were appointed as local Gimi Ju unit leaders, but soon turned against Dang out of significant frustration. Local officials in the last years of Goguryeo had jurisdiction over both military and civilian issues alike, so these Gimi leaders newly appointed by Dang were bound to be unhappy of the new authority they were granted as Gimi units’ prefects, as they were quite limiting from their perspective.
The Dang government had vibrant discussions over the issue of what direction should be taken by such policy, especially in the process of dealing with surrendered Turk households. And Dang’s ruling of Goguryeo initially did not escape the confines of such discussions. But Dang’s such Gimi-buju governing policy met with severe resistance by the former Goguryeo citizens in the very early stage. As a result, the Dang policy was not able to function as expected. Goguryeo influentials (fortress lords) who had collaborated with Dang were appointed as local Gimi Ju unit leaders, but soon turned against Dang out of significant frustration. Local officials in the last years of Goguryeo had jurisdiction over both military and civilian issues alike, so these Gimi leaders newly appointed by Dang were bound to be unhappy of the new authority they were granted as Gimi units’ prefects, as they were quite limiting from their perspective.
목차
머리말
1. 고구려의 멸망과 고지의 재편
2. 기미지배의 적용과 유민의 대응
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (30)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
당의 고구려 유민 정책과 유민들의 동향
역사와현실
2016 .09
-
고구려 유민 묘지명의 고구려 관련 전승과 그 계통
역사와현실
2020 .09
-
入唐 百濟 遺民과 그 후손들의 혼인과 가족 관계 - 高句麗 遺民과의 비교 -
목간과문자
2024 .12
-
7세기 왜국의 外征과 內戰의 ‘戰後처리’와 일본의 탄생
日本思想
2017 .01
-
7세기 후반 신라의 지배질서 정비와 여제 유민의 대응
한국사연구
2023 .06
-
前燕 속의 ‘高句麗系 流民’
이화사학연구
2021 .12
-
‘內臣之番’으로서의 百濟 · 高句麗遺民 -武周시기부터 玄宗 開元期에 이르기 까지 유민 양상과 그 변화-
고구려발해연구
2019 .07
-
고구려 유민 묘지명에 나타난 당인 관인의 ‘高句麗’ 인식
동서인문학
2018 .02
-
연남생 투항 이후 고구려 서북부 성곽방어체계의 붕괴과정과 그 영향
역사와현실
2021 .12
-
고구려 검모잠·안승 세력과 대신라관계 인식
신라사학보
2020 .08
-
고구려 멸망 직후 당의 고구려 故地 지배 시도와 유민의 동향
대구사학
2018 .01
-
고구려 멸망 후 요동 지역의 동향 -안동도호부 및 치청 번진과의 관계를 중심으로-
대구사학
2018 .01
-
한국시가의 流民에 대한 시선과 시적 정의
민족문화연구
2015 .01
-
遺民墓誌銘을 통해본 唐의 東方政策과 高句麗 遺民의 동향
동양학
2017 .01
-
고구려 진파리1호분 연구
역사와현실
2015 .03
-
한국 내 무슬림 난민의 현황, 난민제도의 이해 및 한국 기독교 교회의 과제
Muslim-Christian Encounter
2016 .03
-
조선 현종~숙종 연간 기후 재난의 여파와 유민(流民) 대책의 변화
역사와현실
2020 .12
-
발해 유민사 관련 고고학 자료의 검토
고구려발해연구
2015 .07
-
고구려와 북조의 조공관계 성격
한국사학보
2019 .05
-
唐의 喪葬令을 통해 본 고구려·백제 遺民의 喪葬禮
한국고대사연구
2021 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-911-001093366