지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제122호
- 발행연도
- 2021.12
- 수록면
- 67 - 104 (38page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2021.12.122.67
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In previous studies that examined Yeon Nam-saeng’s surrender and its aftermath, presented were only two kinds of understanding of the fact that written records show no sign of the Dang forces attacking Goguryeo fortresses in the Laiodung peninsula, since Yeon’s surrender till the fall of Goguryeo. Some studies just assumed that the fortresses would have been obliterated when the Dang forces swarmed in for the first time. Others speculated that with Yeon’s surrender, the Guknae-seong fortress area -which was also his base of power- would have been immediately abused as a platform for Dang forces’ entry into the Pyeong’yang area.
Considering the ancient Chinese historians’ tendency of exaggerating their own achievements and at the same time hiding rather shameful ones, possibility of the first assumption being true is remote. Meanwhile, the second conjecture lacks detailed analysis of the situation, which is unfortunate as the situation may have had something to do with the fact that the initial frontline maintained by the Goguryeo force was indeed retreating as time went on and neared the fall of the dynasty(668).
The most probable variable that may have factored into the situation must have been the sudden availability of a certain route that would allow the Dang forces to launch a direct assault on the Ogol-seong fortress. The Dang forces had already favored this route back in 645, but during that conflict both parties -on the Liaodung peninsula, the Guknae-seong area and the Soja-ha river basin-were suppressing each other from either using or securing that route. So it was impossible for the Dang forces to use that route back then, but now in the 660s the Dang forces were able to exploit it.
Interestingly, as a result of all this, after the dynasty’s fall the Goguryeo troops in the Liaodung peninsula effectively turned into a refugee army which Dang had to deal with, and the situation was further complicated by the movements in Tibet. All this distraction allowed Shilla to have some precious time to secure the late Baekje’s old territory, in the middle of a war with Dang no less. In retrospect, the surrender of Yeon Nam-saeng not only led to the fall of Goguryeo, but also tied into the Goguryeo Resurrection movement, and even the course of the Shilla-Dang war.
Considering the ancient Chinese historians’ tendency of exaggerating their own achievements and at the same time hiding rather shameful ones, possibility of the first assumption being true is remote. Meanwhile, the second conjecture lacks detailed analysis of the situation, which is unfortunate as the situation may have had something to do with the fact that the initial frontline maintained by the Goguryeo force was indeed retreating as time went on and neared the fall of the dynasty(668).
The most probable variable that may have factored into the situation must have been the sudden availability of a certain route that would allow the Dang forces to launch a direct assault on the Ogol-seong fortress. The Dang forces had already favored this route back in 645, but during that conflict both parties -on the Liaodung peninsula, the Guknae-seong area and the Soja-ha river basin-were suppressing each other from either using or securing that route. So it was impossible for the Dang forces to use that route back then, but now in the 660s the Dang forces were able to exploit it.
Interestingly, as a result of all this, after the dynasty’s fall the Goguryeo troops in the Liaodung peninsula effectively turned into a refugee army which Dang had to deal with, and the situation was further complicated by the movements in Tibet. All this distraction allowed Shilla to have some precious time to secure the late Baekje’s old territory, in the middle of a war with Dang no less. In retrospect, the surrender of Yeon Nam-saeng not only led to the fall of Goguryeo, but also tied into the Goguryeo Resurrection movement, and even the course of the Shilla-Dang war.
목차
머리말
1. 연남생의 투항과 고구려 서북부 성곽방어체계 기능의 붕괴
2. 고구려 멸망 후 요동의 잔존세력의 활동과 한반도 정세의 변화
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (42)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
당의 고구려 유민 정책과 유민들의 동향
역사와현실
2016 .09
-
고구려 유민 묘지명의 고구려 관련 전승과 그 계통
역사와현실
2020 .09
-
소통하는 구비역사이자 지역사로서의 당신화 - 서울 행당동 아기씨당 당신화를 중심으로 -
한민족문화연구
2020 .01
-
고구려 부흥전쟁의 발발과 그 성격
대구사학
2018 .01
-
당의 고구려 고지(故地) 지배 방식과 유민(遺民)의 대응
역사와현실
2016 .09
-
임윤지당의 자기 정체성 구성에 대하여
열린정신 인문학연구
2019 .08
-
가야 諸國과 고구려의 관계
한국고대사연구
2020 .06
-
고구려와 북조의 조공관계 성격
한국사학보
2019 .05
-
고구려 ‘도성제’론의 궤적과 함의
역사와현실
2016 .12
-
遭遇와 衝突로 高句麗 後期를 이해하다 -김진한, 2020, 『고구려 후기 대외관계사 연구』-
선사와 고대
2021 .01
-
화주당의 존재양상과 의미
한국무속학
2015 .08
-
고구려 검모잠·안승 세력과 대신라관계 인식
신라사학보
2020 .08
-
충주고구려비를 통해 본 5세기 중반 고구려와 신라와의 관계
고구려발해연구
2019 .11
-
고구려 연개소문의 生沒年에 대한 검토
고조선단군학
2024 .08
-
7세기 중엽 국제정세 변동과 고구려 대외관계의 추이
대구사학
2018 .01
-
고구려 ‘남평양(南平壤)’ 위치와 변천에 대한 검토
전북사학
2022 .11
-
660년대 고구려의 대남방 전략
대구사학
2018 .01
-
고등학교 『한국사』 교과서의高句麗 滅亡期 및 復興運動 서술 분석과 제안
역사교육논집
2018 .01
-
前燕 속의 ‘高句麗系 流民’
이화사학연구
2021 .12
-
계림주 설치 전후 당의 정책에 대한 신라의 대응
신라사학보
2022 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0