지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2016.9
- 수록면
- 421 - 441 (21page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Believing that Caesar might change his nature after he is crowned, Brutus makes up his mind to join the conspirators planning to kill Caesar. The very motivation by which Brutus joins to conspirators is fairly ironic.
By making the ironic judgement, Cassius brings about his own death by killing Caesar. Cassius believed he was repressed under Caesar and could shake off his bondage by killing him but, though Caesar is removed, Cassius keeps bearing the ironical bondage under which his opinions are always neglected by Brutus. When Brutus kills Caesar to prevent the future tyranny of Rome, he talks about the attributes of the spirit of Caesar which is common to all, but ironically he himself shows the spirit of Caesar. As the ghost of dead Caesar tells to Brutus, he has Caesar’s evil spirit. He does not realize this reality until the time of his death. The whole process of the story is ironical in which Brutus and other conspirators construe the situation they are in after their own fashion.
By the fact that Brutus is called an honorable man by all other characters Shakespeare seems to ask us whether Brutus is truly an honorable man or a more cunning hypocrite. Because at the beginning of the drama Cassius says to Brutus he becomes a glass in which Brutus can discover his own self. Brutus, however, does not realize his true identity by watching his own self reflected in the glass of Cassius. He shows his ironical self-righteousness to the end and is avenged by killing himself with the same sword he used to kill Caesar.
Showing from the individual behaviors of the characters to most of the situations of the drama, many forms of verbal ironies and situational ironies are used by which Shakespeare makes us remind of human beings’ ambivalent nature and many ironies of life itself.
By making the ironic judgement, Cassius brings about his own death by killing Caesar. Cassius believed he was repressed under Caesar and could shake off his bondage by killing him but, though Caesar is removed, Cassius keeps bearing the ironical bondage under which his opinions are always neglected by Brutus. When Brutus kills Caesar to prevent the future tyranny of Rome, he talks about the attributes of the spirit of Caesar which is common to all, but ironically he himself shows the spirit of Caesar. As the ghost of dead Caesar tells to Brutus, he has Caesar’s evil spirit. He does not realize this reality until the time of his death. The whole process of the story is ironical in which Brutus and other conspirators construe the situation they are in after their own fashion.
By the fact that Brutus is called an honorable man by all other characters Shakespeare seems to ask us whether Brutus is truly an honorable man or a more cunning hypocrite. Because at the beginning of the drama Cassius says to Brutus he becomes a glass in which Brutus can discover his own self. Brutus, however, does not realize his true identity by watching his own self reflected in the glass of Cassius. He shows his ironical self-righteousness to the end and is avenged by killing himself with the same sword he used to kill Caesar.
Showing from the individual behaviors of the characters to most of the situations of the drama, many forms of verbal ironies and situational ironies are used by which Shakespeare makes us remind of human beings’ ambivalent nature and many ironies of life itself.
목차
I
II
III
IV. 결론
인용문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (16)
참고문헌 신청
[단행본] - Baldick, Chris / 2001 / The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms / Oxford UP
[단행본] - Bloom, Harold / 1998 / Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human / Penguin Putnam
[단행본] - Daiches, David / 1982 / Shakespeare’s Tragedies / Penguin : 39 ~ 45
[단행본] - Evans, Bertrand / 1979 / Shakespeare’s Tragic Practice / Clarendon P
[단행본] - Gregson, James / 1983 / Public & Private Man in Shakespeare / Biddles
[단행본] - Bloom, Harold / 1998 / Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human / Penguin Putnam
[단행본] - Daiches, David / 1982 / Shakespeare’s Tragedies / Penguin : 39 ~ 45
[단행본] - Evans, Bertrand / 1979 / Shakespeare’s Tragic Practice / Clarendon P
[단행본] - Gregson, James / 1983 / Public & Private Man in Shakespeare / Biddles
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
김동인 단편 소설에 나타난 아이러니 연구
현대문학이론연구
2021 .01
-
현대소설의 아이러니 읽기 교육
국어문학
2017 .11
-
오규원 초기시의 아이러니 연구 - 『분명한 사건(事件)』을 중심으로 -
한국문학과 예술
2020 .12
-
아이러니
수필미학
2015 .12
-
이윤기 소설에 나타난 삶의 은유와 아이러니 - 「숨은그림찾기 1 : 직선과 곡선」을 중심으로
한국문예비평연구
2017 .03
-
한국 현대시의 포스트모더니즘 아이러니 양상
한국시학연구
2018 .08
-
김수영의 ｢반시론｣에 나타난 키에르케고르 아이러니의 영향
한국현대문학연구
2019 .12
-
기형도 시의 아이러니 양상과 효과
우리문학연구
2025 .01
-
야담 아이러니의 전개와 절망 극복의 서사
국어국문학
2016 .12
-
최인훈 연작 소설의 아이러니 연구 : 「크리스마스 캐럴」 연작과 「총독의 소리」 연작을 대상으로
비평문학
2018 .12
-
Korean Irony Corpus Construction
언어와 정보
2023 .06
-
이병주 소설에 나타난 ‘예술’과 ‘아이러니’의 상관성 연구
우리문학연구
2019 .01
-
Undoing Irony: Between Epistemology and Ontology
비평과이론
2016 .01
-
의사소통과정에서 나타나는 은유와 아이러니의 콜라보, 그리고 적합성
언어과학연구
2018 .12
-
사회적 친밀감 조성/증대를 위한 담화전략으로서의 아이러니 사용과 그 원리, 그리고 적합성
영어영문학연구
2019 .01
-
정치캠페인 속의 아이러니, 그리고 적합성
언어학연구
2020 .01
-
Necessity of Using Video in College English Writing Course - Focusing on ‘Irony’ -
수사학
2020 .12
-
반성적 시 읽기의 실현을 위한 교수‧학습의 방향 - 아이러니를 중심으로 -
우리말글
2022 .03
-
아이러니와 창조적 서사 매커니즘: 제인 오스틴의 Pride and Prejudice를 중심으로
신영어영문학
2024 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-840-001345503