메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
한정한 (단국대학교)
저널정보
한국어학회 한국어학 한국어학 제73권
발행연도
2016.11
수록면
193 - 222 (30page)
DOI
10.20405/kl.2016.11.73.193

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to introduce the notion of detransitivizing in line of linguistic typology, and try to explain Korean object case marker LUL in terms of a marker (=particle) that indicates one (or more) of the transitivity features of Hopper & Thompson (1980). Detransitivizing is a various kinds of non-typical transitive sentences that have been cross-linguistically found when transitivity features become disappeared or weaker.
To define transitivity, this paper takes stance on prototypical transitivity, and it argues against markedness transitivity (Comrie’s generalization (de Swart 2003, Næss 2007), saying that the former can explain better about the transitivity and detransitivizing phenomena cross-linguistically than the latter can, based on which the long-term syntactic dichotomy between transitive and intransitive cannot be more retainable. According to prototypical transitivity, transitivity is defined as a bundle of 10 or so semantic features that composes transitivity. Basing on the various typological data and some Korean evidences dwelt with in this paper, we proposed that among 10 or so features 2 (or more) participants (A and O) appear to be most typical elements that compose prototypical transitivity, but other features are not given any different weight among them.
In line of this foundlings, we propose that Korean objet case LUL can be better explained if we understand LUL as a particle indicating transitivity features, contrast to the Case or the special definitive markers. As a result, the LUL can appear whenever the one (or more) of the transitivity features occur in the given sentences, regardless of transitive or intransitive sentences.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 타동성의 원형 이론
3. 타동성의 유표성 이론
4. 탈타동성 현상의 예들
5. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (67)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-701-001850289