메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
법무부 국제법무정책과 통상법률 통상법률 제56호
발행연도
2004.4
수록면
136 - 185 (50page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
As transnational commerce grew tremendously in recent decades, the volume of domestic litigation involving foreign aspects has concomitantly increased. Litigants attempting to take evidence located abroad have met both complicated procedures and significant obstacles. To understand these procedures and obstacles, this article explains the background information on the essential differences between common law and civil law evidence gathering. Discovery in the United States, a common law nation, is basically a private matter between the parties. Hence, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in America afford very broad discovery while limiting courts' involvement to enforcing applicable rules, resolving procedural disputes, and protecting against abuses. On the other hand, civil law countries such as South Korea do not consider discovery and trial as separate phases in an action; obtaining evidence takes place during the pendency of a trial and the judge controls the taking of evidence. To improve methods of taking evidence when witnesses, documents, or other materials are found abroad, the United States became a signatory to the Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters. By contrast, South Korea has yet to become a party to the Convention. To analyze evidence gathering between the United States and another signatory to the Convention on basis of the information stated above will help us to avoid some difficulty and confusion when South Korea joins the Convention. In addition, this article will explore the taking of evidence between the United States and a non-signatory to the Convention, and discuss whether evidence obtained in a country which is not a party to the Convention is admissible before the courts in America.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-360-002331795