메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이선주 (이화여대)
저널정보
19세기영어권문학회 19세기 영어권 문학 19세기 영어권 문학 제21권 제1호
발행연도
2017.2
수록면
57 - 83 (27page)
DOI
10.24152/NCLE.2017.02.21.1.57

이용수

DBpia Top 10%동일한 주제분류 기준으로
최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The reason why I look at Frankenstein from a posthuman perspective is that the monster in the novel is not an animal-like human being but an artificial life made by technology. The scientific experiment that Frankenstein tried to create was successful, different from his expectation. The monster is not only surprising for the outset of the 19<SUP>th</SUP> century when the novel was first published, but also surprising even in the situation of contemporary times in which artificial life has developed. The monster has been actually produced as an artificial human transgressing the boundaries between the human and non-human, the organic and machine. Chapter 2 examines that the modern science represented by Frankenstein is based on mechanistic theory. The process of making a human out of inorganic material such as the limbs of a dead body by applying artificial material such as electricity is based on the mechanistic theory of modern science. I analyze that Frankenstein’s action of discarding the artificial human at the moment of his creation due to the monstrous appearance is based on the Cartesian mechanistic theory. Chapter 3 investigates that the narrative in which the monster forms a consciousness through his senses coincides with the concept of sense and consciousness from the posthuman perspective. Consciousness is not unique to the human nor produced from a specific area of the brain. Chapter 4 focuses on the narrative of Frankenstein, recording the emergence of the artificial life, thus showing the attributes of mechanistic text. I try to analyze that from the mid-section in which the monster starts up a whirlwind by subsuming the control of the text to himself. I emphasize how the resolute action that Frankenstein demonstrates when he loses all against the monster can be considered as Gilles Deleuz’s ‘Becoming,’ that is, ‘becoming monster.’

목차

1. 왜 포스트휴먼 관점인가
2. 프랑켄슈타인의 기계론적 근대 과학
3. 포스트휴먼 관점에서의 감각과 의식
4. 인공생명의 출현을 기록한 텍스트로서의 특징
인용문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (28)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-840-002314626