지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper analyzes the religious spirituality of ‘Newness’ which is established in Ham Seok‐heon’s(1901-1989) basic ground of religious ideological paradigm and the possibility of Korea religious spirituality.
Ham Seok-heon uses the religious cultural context and background, which led Ham Seok‐heon to underlying awakening of ‘Newness’, as the criteria of his religious thoughts by getting a religious level of spiritual experience and layers of the concept of ‘Newness’.
All along his life, his critical mind which tried to achieve the advent of ‘New Personality’, the reform of Korean society, and the solution of ills of human civilization finally led him to the declaration that ‘Newness’ is the very ‘New Religion.’ Ham Seok-heon organized ‘New Religion’, which was his lifelong topic, with a thinking system of ‘Newness’. In other words, Ham Seok-heon understood ‘Newness’, as an organism, is the principle of operation in the Universe, human, history and religion. It is the empathic awareness of ssial(씨), and also a symbolic system emblematizing the image of a new land.
Ham Seok-Heon’s newness connotes transcendental reason and transcendental volition of practical spontaneity. In short, Ham Seok-heon’s ‘Newness’ has significance in presenting a code of conduct which makes it possible to be in solidarity with ‘Newness’ while expecting ssials’ spontaneous diffusion in seven sorts of attributes of ‘Newness’.
In this context, it might be possible to evaluate that the awareness system, which succeeds Wonhyo’s (元曉) Hwajaengron (話爭論), and Choi, Chiwon’s (崔致遠) Pohamnon (包含論), was inherited by Ham Seok-heon. His ‘Newness’ is an ontological language, a symbol of mystery experience with the absolute being, and also an epistemological language of encompassing & transcending co-existence as well as a practical language which is guaranteeing spontaneity.
Through this, layers of religious spirituality which are opened by newness and ssials who are aware of sacred experience, are living ‘now, here’ with spontaneous practice. Feelings of solidarity with inquiry to the institutional level of methodological alternative of encompassing & transcending co-existence is the very ‘Newness’, ‘New Personality’, and ‘a New Religion’, which is the criteria of Ham Seok-heon’s religious thoughts.
Ham Seok-heon uses the religious cultural context and background, which led Ham Seok‐heon to underlying awakening of ‘Newness’, as the criteria of his religious thoughts by getting a religious level of spiritual experience and layers of the concept of ‘Newness’.
All along his life, his critical mind which tried to achieve the advent of ‘New Personality’, the reform of Korean society, and the solution of ills of human civilization finally led him to the declaration that ‘Newness’ is the very ‘New Religion.’ Ham Seok-heon organized ‘New Religion’, which was his lifelong topic, with a thinking system of ‘Newness’. In other words, Ham Seok-heon understood ‘Newness’, as an organism, is the principle of operation in the Universe, human, history and religion. It is the empathic awareness of ssial(씨), and also a symbolic system emblematizing the image of a new land.
Ham Seok-Heon’s newness connotes transcendental reason and transcendental volition of practical spontaneity. In short, Ham Seok-heon’s ‘Newness’ has significance in presenting a code of conduct which makes it possible to be in solidarity with ‘Newness’ while expecting ssials’ spontaneous diffusion in seven sorts of attributes of ‘Newness’.
In this context, it might be possible to evaluate that the awareness system, which succeeds Wonhyo’s (元曉) Hwajaengron (話爭論), and Choi, Chiwon’s (崔致遠) Pohamnon (包含論), was inherited by Ham Seok-heon. His ‘Newness’ is an ontological language, a symbol of mystery experience with the absolute being, and also an epistemological language of encompassing & transcending co-existence as well as a practical language which is guaranteeing spontaneity.
Through this, layers of religious spirituality which are opened by newness and ssials who are aware of sacred experience, are living ‘now, here’ with spontaneous practice. Feelings of solidarity with inquiry to the institutional level of methodological alternative of encompassing & transcending co-existence is the very ‘Newness’, ‘New Personality’, and ‘a New Religion’, which is the criteria of Ham Seok-heon’s religious thoughts.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 함석헌의 ‘새로움’이라는 종교사상과 그 실천적 함의
Ⅲ. 함석헌의 ‘새로움’ 종교개념의 범주적 특징
Ⅳ. 함석헌의 ‘새로움’ 종교개념의 종교사상적 의의
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (28)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
함석헌 노자관의 특징과 의의
철학논총
2016 .10
-
함석헌의 사회참여론과 종교관에 대한 고찰: 시(詩) 「흰 손」과 「대선언」을 중심으로
신학과 학문
2022 .04
-
함석헌의 종교사상과 잠재태(潛在態)로서의 씨알종교공동체
신종교연구
2017 .01
-
김수영과 함석헌(1) - 함석헌의 생명 사상과 김수영의 혁명론
현대문학의 연구
2021 .10
-
고전과 해석 그리고 철학: 함석헌의 초월해석학과 ‘K-철학’
현대유럽철학연구
2022 .07
-
함석헌의 자아론에서 국가주의 비판의 뜻
철학연구
2025 .02
-
교회의 공공성에 대한 함석헌과 하우어워스의 입장 비교 연구 ― 종말론적 정치신학의 관점에서
신학사상
2021 .12
-
만남 속에 있음 ‒함석헌과 존재의 문제‒
철학
2020 .02
-
함석헌 노장이해의 특징
양명학
2016 .12
-
표층과 심층의 시각에서 바라본 대순진리회 - 종교적 경험의 관점에서 -
대순사상논총
2016 .12
-
“유연한 갈망”으로 부서지는 언어 ― 2000년대 이후 재미 디아스포라 시의 새로움
국제한인문학연구
2021 .08
-
다문화사회에서 종교의 교육적 수용
대순사상논총
2023 .06
-
당대 중국 종교정책에 나타나는 권익의 보호와 통제 ― 2018년 수정 ｢종교사무조례｣를 중심으로
중국학
2018 .01
-
21세기 종교의 공공성과 사회적 책임 그리고 종교학의 역할
종교연구
2025 .04
-
종교와 이성 사이: 종교 경험의 토대주의(foundationalism) 비판
인문과학연구
2015 .01
-
함석헌의 『바가바드 기타』 주석에 나타나는 인용 모음 주석법의 재해석
인도철학
2016 .01
-
종교교육학의 관점에서 본 포스트 코로나 시대 한국종교 －그 과제와 전망－
종교연구
2022 .04
-
‘종교 문해력’의 의미와 역할 －사회적 활용 방안을 중심으로－
종교연구
2024 .10
-
한국의 온라인 종교문화에 대한 시론적 연구
대순사상논총
2023 .06
-
종교교재 개발의 과제와 전망
종교교육학연구
2024 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-205-001251294