지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Using primary data, this study set out to analyze the responding strategies adopted by the ROK government to overcome the fear of abandonment by the United States at the early stages of the Pueblo incident. The ROK government sought to cooperate with the United States by integrating with the 1.21 incident to make the Pueblo Incident aware of US and international community that it reflected the security threat to East Asia by North Korea. However, the US pursued direct negotiations with North Korea, which sparked a fear of abandonment in the ROK government. As a result, the latter requested a resolution of the UN Security Council that included objections to the North Korea-US negotiation, as well as condemnation, disciplining, and the prevention measures of recurrence against North Korea. In response, the US dispatched special envoys to ROK to announce that they would not abandon the country and would continue to provide military aid. However, the Korean government’s fear of abandonment persisted due to concerns over the easy settlement of the North Korea-US negotiation and the need to revise the ROK-US Mutual Defense Treaty. Through this, the ROK government attempted to confirm the South Korean support of the sixteen nations involved in the Korean War. As a result, the US reaffirmed its defense of ROK and held its annual meeting between ROK and US Ministers.
목차
1. 서론
2. 한국의 1.21사태와 푸에블로호사건의 통합대응 시도
3. 미국의 북미협상 추진과 한국의 대응
4. 한미공동성명 이후 한국의 두려움 지속과 해소
5. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
건국절 제정의 타당성과 추진방안
法學論文集
2015 .01
-
대한민국 헌법 하에서 북한식 연방제 통일의 위헌성
法學論文集
2016 .01
-
Latest Developments in North Korea’s Cyber Aggression and the ROK’s Responses
IFANS FOCUS
2023 .05
-
60 Years of Normalization of ROK-Japan Diplomatic Relations: Achievements and Challenges
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2025 .01
-
The 2020 NPT Review Conference and the Role of the ROK
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2019 .01
-
Proposing Key Concepts of the ROK’s National Security Strategy
IFANS FOCUS
2017 .11
-
Understanding the ROK–U.S. Missile Guidelines
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2024 .09
-
North Korea between China, Japan and the ROK, 2012–2016
Korea Journal
2018 .09
-
전시작전통제권 전환과 한미동맹의 변화
국방연구
2016 .03
-
The Trump Administration's Policy toward North Korea
Journal of North Korea Studies
2017 .12
-
The Future Direction of the US-ROK Alliance
IFANS FOCUS
2017 .08
-
헌법 제3조 영토조항과 저작권법의 효력
계간 저작권
2021 .09
-
미·중 경쟁 시대, 중국의 대미정책, 한국은?
계간 외교
2021 .04
-
The Vietnam War, Korea’s Opportunity for More Reliable Security Assurances
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2015 .01
-
美 사회통합형 용도지역제(Inclusionary Zoning)의 우리나라 도입에 관한 연구
부동산학보
2015 .01
-
The Effect of Korean Domestic Politics on the Negotiations Surrounding the Withdrawal of US Troops from the Korean Peninsula in 1970-71
JIAS
2023 .06
-
Completing the U.S.-Japan-Korea Alliance Triangle: Prospects and Issues in Japan-Korea Security Cooperation
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2016 .01
-
미래 한미동맹 발전을 위한 조약법적 검토 : 미군기지 정화책임을 중심으로
국제법학회논총
2019 .03
-
ROK’s Indo-Pacific Strategy and Its Commitment to Cooperation with ASEAN
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2023 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-390-001663812