지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In short, federation system is against national identity of "Republic of Korea"(hereafter abbreviated as ROK). It is because ROK or South Korea has adopted unitary state system since a new nation building in 1948. Regarding national form, unitary state system has never been expressly declared in the successive South Korean constitutions. Notwithstanding the fact, it is regarded as an unwritten or customary constitutional law that ROK is an unitary state. As a result, pursuing unification of South and North Korea by federation is clearly unconstitutional under ROK's Constitution.
Related with this, South Korean president shall have a sincere responsibility to ensure and defend the continuity of a state according to the Article 66 Paragraph 2 of ROK's constitution. So ROK's president and government under his/her control should seek after a peaceful unification policy on the basis of free and democratic order, maintaining a national identity of ROK as a unitary state. If the South accepts and pursues unification in accordance with the North's proposal for unification by federation, it will necessarily bring about renunciation of national sovereignty by reducing ROK's independent state status to local autonomous government status. In other words, South Korea will be equal to North Korea which shall be considered an "anti-state organization" under ROK's constitution. This means denying ROK's national legitimacy and its government's soleness and lawfulness on the Korean Peninsula. After all, pursuing Korean unification by federation formula will be in grave violation of Territory Clause, Article 3 of ROK's constitution and of other constitutional norms as well, including Unification Clause(Article 4), Democratic Order Clause(Article 8) etc.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (34)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
건국절 제정의 타당성과 추진방안
法學論文集
2015 .01
-
헌법 제3조 영토조항과 저작권법의 효력
계간 저작권
2021 .09
-
전시작전통제권 전환과 한미동맹의 변화
국방연구
2016 .03
-
60 Years of Normalization of ROK-Japan Diplomatic Relations: Achievements and Challenges
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2025 .01
-
Understanding the ROK–U.S. Missile Guidelines
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2024 .09
-
Proposing Key Concepts of the ROK’s National Security Strategy
IFANS FOCUS
2017 .11
-
The Future Direction of the US-ROK Alliance
IFANS FOCUS
2017 .08
-
The 2020 NPT Review Conference and the Role of the ROK
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2019 .01
-
North Korea between China, Japan and the ROK, 2012–2016
Korea Journal
2018 .09
-
1968년 푸에블로호사건 초기 한국정부의 미국에 대한 대응전략 : ‘방기의 두려움’을 중심으로
군사
2017 .12
-
Latest Developments in North Korea’s Cyber Aggression and the ROK’s Responses
IFANS FOCUS
2023 .05
-
美 사회통합형 용도지역제(Inclusionary Zoning)의 우리나라 도입에 관한 연구
부동산학보
2015 .01
-
냉전 시대로의 회귀? 윤석열 정부의 대러정책과 한·러 관계
국제지역연구
2024 .10
-
ROK’s Indo-Pacific Strategy and Its Commitment to Cooperation with ASEAN
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2023 .06
-
미래 한미동맹 발전을 위한 조약법적 검토 : 미군기지 정화책임을 중심으로
국제법학회논총
2019 .03
-
South Korea's space program and its implications
The Korean Journal of Security Affairs
2021 .12
-
미·중 경쟁 시대, 중국의 대미정책, 한국은?
계간 외교
2021 .04
-
The Effect of Korean Domestic Politics on the Negotiations Surrounding the Withdrawal of US Troops from the Korean Peninsula in 1970-71
JIAS
2023 .06
-
Building a Human Resource Education Strategy: An Effective Decision of the Republic of Korea and Lessons for Higher Education Development in Vietnam
Journal of Global and Area Studies
2020 .01
-
The New ROK-U.S. Nuclear Cooperation Agreement: Its Significance and Tasks
IFANS BRIEF
2015 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0