지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study is the analysis based on Prospect Theory for the North Korea’s mechanism of policy choices on the USS Pueblo Incident happened in 1968.
The Kim’s reference points at the time of the USS Pueblo incident are externally to protect North Korea’s sovereignty, to strengthen the alliance with the U.S.S.R. and China in addition to maintaining the autonomy for national security, internally to consolidate the Kim’s autocratic power and to reinforce the revolutional power against the South Korea
The USS Pueblo incident can be divided into two stages. The first stage is to seize of the USS Pueblo and the first response stage of the U.S.A. and North Korea. (from Jan. 16 to Feb. 1) At this stage, Kim estimated that the U.S.A. would not drive the situations to war because of her domestic and international political difficulties.
In early January 1968, North Korea faced the difficult political situations due to her contradictory relationships with U.S.S.R. and China, the increase of consciousness to be encircled because of the establishment of the diplomatic relationship between South Korea and Japan, and the failure of the raid on Blue House by the North Korea’s guerrillas. In these situations, the information collection of the USS Pueblo on North Korea was a threat against North Korea’s security and a violation of North Korea’s sovereignty, and it was also a challenge against Kim. So Kim perceived the situations were in loss-domain on the basis of his 4 reference points and chose the risk-taking collision policy to seize of the USS Pueblo and to deny negotiation.
The second stage is the negotiations between the U.S.A. and North Korea. (from Feb. 2 to Dec. 23). As all efforts were failed, the leadership of the U.S.A. could not help stopping the armed demonstration and sitting down on the table for the individual negotiations with North Korea. As the negotiations had been going on, the U.S.A. had somewhat conceded ‘3A’(Admit, Apologize, Assure) and North Korea could get the result to be admitted the North Korea’s sovereignty by the U.S.A. Kim had got the result to strengthen the alliance with the U.S.S.R. and to acquire her additional economical and military support, to improve the relationship with China, to enhance his internal & external prestige, to support the North Vietnam indirectly and to succeed in resulting in conflict between Korea and the U.S.A. These situations almost satisfied Kim’s 4 reference points. So Kim perceived the situations as gain-domain and decided to choose the risk-avoiding selection to conclude the negotiations.
This study shows the effectiveness of Prospect Theory. It will be the short cut to grasp the reference points of North Korea’s leadership and the mechanism of policy choice and to cut or change its links in order to prevent and oppose the continuing North Korea’s provocation effectively. This study expects to contribute to this.
The Kim’s reference points at the time of the USS Pueblo incident are externally to protect North Korea’s sovereignty, to strengthen the alliance with the U.S.S.R. and China in addition to maintaining the autonomy for national security, internally to consolidate the Kim’s autocratic power and to reinforce the revolutional power against the South Korea
The USS Pueblo incident can be divided into two stages. The first stage is to seize of the USS Pueblo and the first response stage of the U.S.A. and North Korea. (from Jan. 16 to Feb. 1) At this stage, Kim estimated that the U.S.A. would not drive the situations to war because of her domestic and international political difficulties.
In early January 1968, North Korea faced the difficult political situations due to her contradictory relationships with U.S.S.R. and China, the increase of consciousness to be encircled because of the establishment of the diplomatic relationship between South Korea and Japan, and the failure of the raid on Blue House by the North Korea’s guerrillas. In these situations, the information collection of the USS Pueblo on North Korea was a threat against North Korea’s security and a violation of North Korea’s sovereignty, and it was also a challenge against Kim. So Kim perceived the situations were in loss-domain on the basis of his 4 reference points and chose the risk-taking collision policy to seize of the USS Pueblo and to deny negotiation.
The second stage is the negotiations between the U.S.A. and North Korea. (from Feb. 2 to Dec. 23). As all efforts were failed, the leadership of the U.S.A. could not help stopping the armed demonstration and sitting down on the table for the individual negotiations with North Korea. As the negotiations had been going on, the U.S.A. had somewhat conceded ‘3A’(Admit, Apologize, Assure) and North Korea could get the result to be admitted the North Korea’s sovereignty by the U.S.A. Kim had got the result to strengthen the alliance with the U.S.S.R. and to acquire her additional economical and military support, to improve the relationship with China, to enhance his internal & external prestige, to support the North Vietnam indirectly and to succeed in resulting in conflict between Korea and the U.S.A. These situations almost satisfied Kim’s 4 reference points. So Kim perceived the situations as gain-domain and decided to choose the risk-avoiding selection to conclude the negotiations.
This study shows the effectiveness of Prospect Theory. It will be the short cut to grasp the reference points of North Korea’s leadership and the mechanism of policy choice and to cut or change its links in order to prevent and oppose the continuing North Korea’s provocation effectively. This study expects to contribute to this.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 기존연구의 분석과 전망이론의 적용
3. 푸에블로호사건과 북한의 정책선택
4. 맺음말
〈참고문헌〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (55)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
전망이론과 김정은 시기 북한의 대중정책: 대중 자율성을 중심으로
한국과 국제정치
2025 .03
-
A Look Back at Past South Korean Government's Policies toward North Korea and Search for Sustainable Policy toward North Korea
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2024 .06
-
전망이론과 김정은 시기 북미관계: 2012~2023
한국과 국제정치
2024 .03
-
주변국의 대북정책과 김정은의 대외정책 전망
Journal of North Korea Studies
2015 .06
-
북중관계 변화의 동인과 시진핑시대의 대북정책
국제정치연구
2015 .06
-
북한 김일성･김정일･김정은의 ‘3대세습체제’에 대한 대북정책 변화 고찰
한국행정사학지
2022 .04
-
Changes in the Structure of North Korea’s State Machinery in the Kim Jong Un Era and the Implications for North Korea’s Foreign Policy
IFANS FOCUS
2019 .12
-
What Factors Determine China’s North Korea Policy?: Uncertainty, Instability and Status Quo Risk Management
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2019 .01
-
An Exploratory Study on the Distribution and Marketing Changes Under the North Korean System
산경연구논집
2020 .01
-
Why China Has Supported North Korea: An Asymmetrical Dependent Relationship between China and North Korea from 1995 to 2016
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2021 .12
-
북한 내 “사람값” 담론과 소수자 유형 분류 시도
아세아연구
2015 .03
-
북·중 동맹 관계의 변화 전망- 북한의 제3·4·5차 핵실험에 따른 『인민일보』 보도 분석을 중심으로 -
Journal of North Korea Studies
2017 .06
-
The Change of North Korea's National Image - Analysis of the "Korea Today" -
Journal of North Korea Studies
2016 .06
-
Coexistence of North Korea’s Nuclear Development and Economic Sanctions: The Dilemma of Policy Value Difference
Journal of Peace and Unification
2019 .01
-
한국정부의 대북정책 결정과정에 관한 연구- 정책변동모형을 중심으로 -
Journal of North Korea Studies
2017 .06
-
김정은 시대의 북미 정상회담 연구: 양면게임이론을 중심으로
Journal of North Korea Studies
2021 .01
-
북한의 국가성향 분석과 모의 분석을 통한 핵전략 검증
국방정책연구
2017 .01
-
China's Engagement Patterns towards North Korea
Pacific Focus
2016 .01
-
문재인 정부의 대북정책과 남북관계: 전망과 과제
인문사회 21
2017 .01
-
지속 가능한 대북정책을 위한 남남갈등 쟁점 분석
Journal of North Korea Studies
2022 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
실적발표가 IT기업과 비IT기업의 주가에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구 : 전망이론을 바탕으로
이상근
,
조남석
,
김창수
대한경영학회지
2009
.12
한반도 평화체제와 한반도 비핵화의 가능성과 의미 : 게임이론을 이용한 설명
이성우
국제지역연구
2018
.01
[서평] 6·25전쟁기 군수 분야 연구의 전환점 - 국방부 군사편찬연구소(이상호 지음), 『6·25전쟁기 유엔군 군수지원체제』 -
박성진
군사
2022
.12
‘선승이후구전’을 통한 미드웨이·알류샨 전역계획 재조명 - 『손자병법』 군형(軍形)편의 ‘전장의 선택’과 ‘병법의 다섯 단계’를 중심으로 -
김동은
군사
2022
.12
동맹 결속의 공고함과 느슨함 사이 - ‘파이브 아이즈(Five Eyes)’ 정보 동맹의 역사가 갖는 함의 -
송민선
,
석영달
군사
2022
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0