지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2018.5
- 수록면
- 5 - 13 (9page)
- DOI
- 10.15187/adr.2018.05.31.2.5
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Background : Product design teams have been routinely conducting studies in design research since the late 1970s, when research became a more-accepted part of the design process. However, most of the research conducted falls into the category of what Richard Buchanan termed "clinical" research – focused on gathering information for a specific project being undertaken by a design team. This paper asserts that unless more encompassing forms of research are undertaken, the full potential of design to have a positive impact on our lives will not be realized. With a single goal of finalizing a project, designers typically forgo the collection and dissemination of knowledge that would advance the state of the design profession. The profession therefore tends to place its value on "what designers do" instead of "what designers know."
Methods : This paper references past articles on the topic of design research and knowledge, and combines their thoughts with observations by the author of common practices in the design profession.
Results : While this paper is not reporting on results of a specific study in design research, it strives to put the current state of design and research activities in perspective, with a call to leave design`s past practices behind to expand and evolve our knowledge in design – by focusing on better understanding of people. It also suggests that the methods by which design teams are assembled, in an agency or corporate design department, can have limitations. An alternative model, being tested by some, calls for the formation of collectives of experts in design-related topics, putting together teams of the "most appropriate" people, not the "most available," as is often the situation in real-world practice.
Conclusions : The methods developed and touted by designers since the late 1970s, now commonplace, call for research activities to take place at the outset of a project to guide design efforts. Research conducted in the majority of projects is process-based, meant to reach a goal as opposed to add to a wider knowledge base. This paper makes the case however that in order to advance the profession, to further unleash the power of design, a change in mindset must be implemented. More value needs to be placed on knowledge in design.
A challenge will be to shift design`s focus from the product, the legacy of the industrial design profession, to understanding people. This would call for a significant change in design schools` curriculums.
Methods : This paper references past articles on the topic of design research and knowledge, and combines their thoughts with observations by the author of common practices in the design profession.
Results : While this paper is not reporting on results of a specific study in design research, it strives to put the current state of design and research activities in perspective, with a call to leave design`s past practices behind to expand and evolve our knowledge in design – by focusing on better understanding of people. It also suggests that the methods by which design teams are assembled, in an agency or corporate design department, can have limitations. An alternative model, being tested by some, calls for the formation of collectives of experts in design-related topics, putting together teams of the "most appropriate" people, not the "most available," as is often the situation in real-world practice.
Conclusions : The methods developed and touted by designers since the late 1970s, now commonplace, call for research activities to take place at the outset of a project to guide design efforts. Research conducted in the majority of projects is process-based, meant to reach a goal as opposed to add to a wider knowledge base. This paper makes the case however that in order to advance the profession, to further unleash the power of design, a change in mindset must be implemented. More value needs to be placed on knowledge in design.
A challenge will be to shift design`s focus from the product, the legacy of the industrial design profession, to understanding people. This would call for a significant change in design schools` curriculums.
목차
Abstract
1. The word “design“
2. The form-function dilemma
3. People research
4. The emergence of design research
5. Rethinking the culture
6. Collectives may be an answer
7. The need for applied and basic design research
References
참고문헌 (8)
참고문헌 신청
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Buchanan, R. / 2001 / Design research and the new learning / Design issues 17 (4) : 3 ~ 23
[인터넷자원] - CB Insights / / The Top 20 Reasons Startups Fail
[단행본] - Dreyfuss, H. / 1955 / Designing for people / Simon and Schuster
[학술대회논문] - Frankel, L. / 2010 / The complex field of research: For design, through design, and about design / Proceedings of the Design Research Society (DRS) International Conference
[인터넷자원] - Maeda / / Design in Tech Report 2016
[인터넷자원] - CB Insights / / The Top 20 Reasons Startups Fail
[단행본] - Dreyfuss, H. / 1955 / Designing for people / Simon and Schuster
[학술대회논문] - Frankel, L. / 2010 / The complex field of research: For design, through design, and about design / Proceedings of the Design Research Society (DRS) International Conference
[인터넷자원] - Maeda / / Design in Tech Report 2016
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
My Design
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2019 .05
-
Design
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2018 .11
-
DESIGN THINKING
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2018 .05
-
why new design
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2019 .05
-
The Value of Design
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2018 .05
-
Zero Design
한국디자인학회 국제초대전도록
2018 .11
-
HOW TO DESIGN
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2024 .06
-
디자인문화 확산을 위한 Social Design System 구축
한국디자인학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2015 .10
-
Design Process No°15
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2019 .11
-
인간중심디자인과 서비스디자인의 융합교육 사례 연구
한국실내디자인학회 학술대회논문집
2016 .06
-
PRODUCT SERVICE SYSTEMS: THE FUTURE FOR DESIGNERS? : THE CHANGING ROLE OF THE INDUSTRIAL DESIGNER
한국디자인학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2015 .10
-
Design Future
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2023 .06
-
Mapping the Characteristics of Design Research in Social Sciences
Archives of Design Research
2019 .11
-
디자인 지식 이해 및 디자인 행위 맥락에 관한 연구
한국디자인학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2023 .10
-
life with design
한국디자인학회 국제초대전도록
2023 .10
-
Design Research Today : Challenges and Opportunities
Archives of Design Research
2018 .08
-
Terms of design
한국디자인학회 국제초대전도록
2015 .05
-
Development of Sustainable Fashion Design Education Program
Archives of Design Research
2022 .11
-
A Study on the Collaboration with Generative AI for Non-designers in the double-diamond Design Process
한국디자인리서치학회
2024 .03
-
Reshaping the Culture of Creativity in Design Education: A Case Study of Collaborative Design Project for the 2020 UN World Expo
한국실내디자인학회 학술대회논문집
2020 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
A Qualitative Study of Designing Customer Experience for Fashion Concept Stores
Lee
,
You Jung
한국디자인문화학회지
2015
.12
Cinemetrics: A Sensori-motor Archive for Design
B
,
ian McG
,
ath
Archives of Design Research
2015
.02
Linking New Service Development and Service Design : An Interdisciplinary Service Research Framework and Future Directions
Eun Yu
Archives of Design Research
2018
.11
Design Constraints and Their Influence upon Design Outcome
Taewan Kim
,
James A. Self
,
Hwajung Hong
Archives of Design Research
2018
.11
미국의 디자인 전문석사학위 제도와 커리큘럼 분석 연구
심은주
Archives of Design Research
2018
.08
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0