지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2018.5
- 수록면
- 131 - 158 (28page)
- DOI
- 10.35227/HYLR.2018.05.29.2.131
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The US Endocrine Disruptors Management Policy focuses on product regulation that contains the substance rather than on the substance itself. The US Endocrine Disruptors Screening Program (EDSP) is underway to identify endocrine disruptors, but there is still an ongoing analysis of what substances are environmental hormones and how they are affected.
Regarding the regulation of endocrine disruptor-containing products in the United States, I examined the regulation of phthalate-containing products in children’s products and the legislation on the regulation of BPA in food containers and bottles. The main basis for the regulation of phthalate-containing products in children’s products is the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act(CPSIA). This Act aims specifically to prohibit the use of lead and phthalates in children’s products. Dec. 31, 2014. As CPSIA has been amended and applied to products manufactured and imported after April 25, 2018, DEHP, DBP, BBP and DINP have been banned and withdrawn from the temporary ban on DIDP and DNOP. In addition, four new phthalates (DIBP, DNPP, DNHP, DCHP) were identified as prohibited substances. CPSIA requires ⒜ third party certification from external testing agencies for children’s products, ⒝and it is mandatory to attach Tracking Labels on both products and packaging.
In the case of BPA regulation in food containers and bottles, 21 FR part 177 prohibits the use of polycarbonate in bottles, etc. Also in California, October 10, 2011, the Toxin-Free Infants and Toddlers Act came into effect, The use of baby bottles, infant drink cups, and feeding devices was prohibited. Nov. 2015 BPA is listed on the Prop. 65 list so that all bottled or bottled bottles sold in the state, not limited to infant bottles and dishes, and bottles or caps of food or beverages containing BPA Sales, and imports of products are prohibited. Prop. 65 lists the chemicals that can cause carcinogenesis and reproductive toxicity as a List and imposes an obligation to display an exposure warning and prohibit the discharge of drinking water sources if the substance exceeds the Safe Harbor Level(SHL).
The criteria for warning signs applied from August 30, 2018 are as follows. (A) be clear and reasonable; (b) be provided by the manufacturer, producer or packer, rather than by the retailer; (c) if no clear and clear warning is given on the packaging or labeling of the consumer product, It is necessary to fulfill a separate warning obligation to the consignee. Various warning methods such as consumer product labels, workplace covers, public service announcements, newspapers and online announcements can be utilized.
Regarding the regulation of endocrine disruptor-containing products in the United States, I examined the regulation of phthalate-containing products in children’s products and the legislation on the regulation of BPA in food containers and bottles. The main basis for the regulation of phthalate-containing products in children’s products is the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act(CPSIA). This Act aims specifically to prohibit the use of lead and phthalates in children’s products. Dec. 31, 2014. As CPSIA has been amended and applied to products manufactured and imported after April 25, 2018, DEHP, DBP, BBP and DINP have been banned and withdrawn from the temporary ban on DIDP and DNOP. In addition, four new phthalates (DIBP, DNPP, DNHP, DCHP) were identified as prohibited substances. CPSIA requires ⒜ third party certification from external testing agencies for children’s products, ⒝and it is mandatory to attach Tracking Labels on both products and packaging.
In the case of BPA regulation in food containers and bottles, 21 FR part 177 prohibits the use of polycarbonate in bottles, etc. Also in California, October 10, 2011, the Toxin-Free Infants and Toddlers Act came into effect, The use of baby bottles, infant drink cups, and feeding devices was prohibited. Nov. 2015 BPA is listed on the Prop. 65 list so that all bottled or bottled bottles sold in the state, not limited to infant bottles and dishes, and bottles or caps of food or beverages containing BPA Sales, and imports of products are prohibited. Prop. 65 lists the chemicals that can cause carcinogenesis and reproductive toxicity as a List and imposes an obligation to display an exposure warning and prohibit the discharge of drinking water sources if the substance exceeds the Safe Harbor Level(SHL).
The criteria for warning signs applied from August 30, 2018 are as follows. (A) be clear and reasonable; (b) be provided by the manufacturer, producer or packer, rather than by the retailer; (c) if no clear and clear warning is given on the packaging or labeling of the consumer product, It is necessary to fulfill a separate warning obligation to the consignee. Various warning methods such as consumer product labels, workplace covers, public service announcements, newspapers and online announcements can be utilized.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 환경보호국(EPA)에 의한 환경호르몬 물질 관리정책
Ⅲ. 내분비장애물질스크리닝프로그램(EDSP)과 환경호르몬 물질관리법제
Ⅳ. 환경호르몬 함유 제품 규제법제
Ⅴ. 시사점과 결론
【참고문헌】
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (22)
참고문헌 신청
[보고서] - 서양원 / 2013 / 위해성평가의 정책 활용도 제고를 위한 화학물질 Action Plan 수립 연구(Ⅱ)
[보고서] - 여민경 / 2012 / 환경호르몬의 영향과 규제방안에 관한 연구
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 윤혜선 / 2016 / 미국의 내분비계 장애물질 규제체계에 관한 연구 / 법학논총 36 (1) : 1005 ~ 1034
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 이호용 / 2017 / EU, 미국, 일본의 화학물질관리법 주요 쟁점 비교 연구 / 법과정책연구 17 (4) : 31 ~ 65
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 이호용 / 2017 / 미국의 내분비교란물질 규제제도로서 내분비교란물질선별제도(EDSP) 연구 / 한양법학 28 (1) : 147 ~ 181
[보고서] - 여민경 / 2012 / 환경호르몬의 영향과 규제방안에 관한 연구
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 윤혜선 / 2016 / 미국의 내분비계 장애물질 규제체계에 관한 연구 / 법학논총 36 (1) : 1005 ~ 1034
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 이호용 / 2017 / EU, 미국, 일본의 화학물질관리법 주요 쟁점 비교 연구 / 법과정책연구 17 (4) : 31 ~ 65
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 이호용 / 2017 / 미국의 내분비교란물질 규제제도로서 내분비교란물질선별제도(EDSP) 연구 / 한양법학 28 (1) : 147 ~ 181
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
내분비교란물질(환경호르몬)의 위협과 법적 대응
법조
2018 .01
-
미국의 내분비교란물질 규제제도로서 내분비교란물질선별제도(EDSP) 연구
한양법학
2017 .02
-
생활화학제품 함유 화학물질에 관한 리스크 커뮤니케이션
한양법학
2023 .02
-
인도의 내분비계 장애물질 및 화학 물질 규제현황
법과 정책연구
2018 .01
-
Research on the Relationship between Product Sales and Product Review Similarity
한국경영과학회 학술대회논문집
2016 .04
-
Public willingness to pay for endocrine disruptor eco-labeling policy in Korea
한국환경정책학회 학술대회논문집
2017 .02
-
일본 환경호르몬물질 관리의 정책과 법제
한양법학
2018 .08
-
소비자의 특성이 온라인 상품평 활용의도에 미치는 영향
한국IT서비스학회지
2017 .01
-
제품안전기준에 관한 행정법적 문제
법학논총
2020 .05
-
비대면 환경에서 제품자료관리 시스템 기반 협동제품개발 실습과제 운영 사례
공학교육연구
2022 .01
-
신선식품 유통 사이트에서 제품 정보품질과 정보원천 신뢰성이 제품환기에 미치는 영향
무역학회지
2021 .10
-
제품안전관리 법 · 제도의 현황과 개선과제
경제규제와 법
2017 .05
-
The Impact of Product Concept Demonstrations on Product Line Design
한국유통학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2018 .04
-
생활화학제품의 안전한 관리를 위한 법제도 개선방안
한양법학
2020 .11
-
Reputation Effect, Business-stealing Effect, and Income Effect in Amazon’s Co-purchasing Product Networks
상품학연구
2015 .01
-
중국 환경호르몬물질 관리정책과 법제에 관한 소고
중국법연구
2018 .01
-
원산지정보 불일치와 브랜드 진정성에 관한 비교연구
무역학회지
2022 .08
-
Moderator Effect of Product Involvement and Brand Familiarity on the Relationship of Country of Manufacture and Chinese Consumers’ Product Attitude
Journal of China Studies
2017 .01
-
중소 제조기업 제품 대상의 비대면 공동 사후관리 서비스 플랫폼
한국경영과학회 학술대회논문집
2023 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-360-002233398