메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
한봉석 (역사문제연구소)
저널정보
한국사연구회 한국사연구 韓國史硏究 제181집
발행연도
2018.6
수록면
267 - 312 (46page)
DOI
10.31791/JKH.2018.06.181.267

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
We need to re-thinking ‘development’ in the context of US Aid to the Korea during 1950’s. There are three reason why we should do that; Recovering Technical Cooperation in Mutual Defense Security Law, To understand What EBASCO did with Korean Government, The role of the ‘Smith, Hinchman & Grylls, Inc.’.
First, We need to analyze the US’s MSA Law during 1950’s free from old review. Most of people used to quote of the Hong seog yoo’s view without such a concept which care technical cooperation. Actually the Technical Cooperation was a key logic doing US AID under less countries such as South Korea. Nevertheless, ‘Engineering Contract’ have not focused on so far.
Then, if we want to understand what the ‘development’ means, we need to check out three historical subjects; US Government, ROK Government, and The ‘Engineering Firm’ such as EBASCO, or Smith, Hinchman & Grylls, Inc. The Failure of EBASCO Contract between ROK and EBASCO shows what happen actually. EBASCO didn’t care about the vision of ROK.
Finally, Smith, Hinchman & Grylls, Inc. had success to contract ‘engineering service contract’ with ROK. SH&G had to do three main tasks for contract; writing a seasonal reports, making ‘task order’, and making ‘work order’. But There were a lot of variable to complies missions. For example, SH&G couldn’t catch up the dead line occasionally. It wasn’t expected part by ROK. So it caused the crack on the development plan of ROK.
In conclusion, it is not a simple question what the real meaning of ‘development’ in the context of US AID during 1950’s. Especially the technical cooperation under MSA Law did important thing such as ‘Engineering Contract’. But, That is why we need to focus on what the engineering firm did actually.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. ‘개발’의 구조 - 기술협조와 ‘기술자문’
Ⅲ. 1950년대 개발에서 ‘기술자문’의 역할과 기능
Ⅵ. 맺음말
참고문헌
〈ABSTRACT〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-911-003133370