메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
심영주 (인하대학교)
저널정보
한양법학회 한양법학 한양법학 제29권 제3집(통권 제63집)
발행연도
2018.8
수록면
181 - 205 (25page)
DOI
10.35227/HYLR.2018.08.29.3.181

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Our society is changing rapidly, and laws and legal systems must be created or modified to keep pace with these changes. As a result, laws are created or existing laws are amended. Criminal laws are no exception, and the role of creating and amending these laws lies with the legislature in accordance with the principle of separation of powers. As the members of the legislature are politicians, they are required to distinguish between their legislative and political activities. However, legislation is becoming a political tool as national demands, such as the demand for safety from crimes, are approached from a political perspective. Accompanying this phenomenon are a number of problems, such as overlapping legislations, symbolic legislations, and the excessive special laws, which are exceptions to the principles of general laws. The legislative tendency in creating or amending criminal statutes is to follow the severe punishment principle, which caters to populism. In other words, strong penalties and punishments are reflected in legislation in order to maximize political purposes and effects. However, this does not take into account the basic principles of criminal law, and problems can arise with the coherence and legitimacy of the legal system. Furthermore, the tendency of the symbolism and severe punishment principle, which takes advantage of populism, treats offenders as potential criminals. In terms of legal economics, strengthening punishments may be of limited use in preventing dangers and crimes. In addition, criminal laws serve to regulate criminal sanctions and is the most powerful sanctioning instrument because it uses imprisonment and fines, which restrict the freedom of the body and property rights. Therefore, the use of criminal law should be a last resort; however, the frequency of the use of criminal sanctions to guarantee the effectiveness of administrative acts in the area of administrative legislation, which is not covered by the existing criminal laws, is increasing. Criminal legislation must consider the principles of proportionalism and responsibility. However, actual criminal legislations do not seem to consider these principles sufficiently because of the abovementioned reasons. Therefore, for reasonable criminal legislation, it is necessary to first consider amending laws that are faithful to the general principles of criminal law, that do not violate the Constitution, and that can meet the demands of social change. For this purpose, the issues of culpability and the integrity of the legal system must be considered in concrete terms. If these requirements can be satisfied, some of the proactive functions of reasonable criminal legislation can be performed to a certain extent, and the limitations that may remain can be improved at a later time.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 형사입법의 현황
Ⅲ. 현행 형사입법의 문제
Ⅳ. 합리적인 형사입법을 위한 기초
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (42)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문과 연관된 판례 (1)

  • 헌법재판소 2009. 2. 26. 선고 2008헌바9,43(병합) 전원재판부

    가. 미성년자를 약취·유인한 자가 재물 등을 요구하였으나 재물 취득에 실패한 경우에는 취득죄의 미수에 해당할 수 있음에도 이 사건 법률 조항이 요구죄를 별도 구성요건으로 하여 취득죄의 기수와 동일한 법정형을 규정한 결과, 재물 요구행위라는 동일한 범죄 사실에 관하여 요구죄 기수나 취득죄의 미수 중 어느 것을 적용할 것인지에 따라 법정형이

    자세히 보기

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0