메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술대회자료
저자정보
김양선 (Luther University) 김문정 (Luther University)
저널정보
한국언어치료학회 한국언어치료학회 학술발표대회 논문집 한국언어치료학회·한국언어청감임상학회 2016년도 제5회 공동학술대회 발표논문집
발행연도
2016.12
수록면
286 - 289 (4page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the application ability of phonological rules through the phonological judgment task, which is a task to judge whether phonemes read through visual recognition and auditory spoken by task are similar. Methods: A total of 30 students were enrolled in a total of 30 elementary school students living in Gyeon-ggi Province. The task has chosen nine of the most popular phonological rules, which are most commonly applied based on prior study. The phonological judgment task is composed of 72 items of 2 syllable words. The clues were consisted of words and non words. The subjects were compared with the speech and phoneme clues that were read through the visual recognition of the word to which the phonological rule was applied. Results: First, in the phonological judgment task, both the words and the non word got high scores in the order of 3rd, 2nd, and 1st grade. In addition, there were significant differences in terms of significance between words and non words. Second, the ability of applying the phonological rules of words in the first, second, and third grades is higher than the phonological rule application ability of non words. Conclusion: In the phonological judgment tasks such as the reading and writing tasks of the previous studies, the ability to apply phonological rules increased as the grade level increased. The phonological judgment task used in this study showed significant difference in the lower grade children, so it was found that it is an appropriate task to find out the ability of the phonological rules applied in the lower grades of school age.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구 방법
Ⅲ. 연구 결과
Ⅳ. 논의 및 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-037-003330590