메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
양승엽 (연세대학교)
저널정보
한국비교노동법학회 노동법논총 勞動法論叢 第43輯
발행연도
2018.8
수록면
81 - 108 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The accident such as the birth of children, who have congenital heart defects occurring in toxic substance of establishment, shows a serious deficiency in the current Industrial accident compensation insurance act. The current act is applied exclusively to only workers who are alive and so have the capacity of enjoyment of rights, so that the children born to be ill because of the harmful environment, where their mothers worked, can not receive the benefits of the industrial accident insurance. The workers who are mothers of the children suffered in the congenital heart defects claimed the compensation of the industrial accident insurance to the Korea workers’ compensation and welfare service, and the service agency rejected the claims because the children were not the workers when the industrial accident occurred in their mothers. The administrative court annulled the decision of the service agency because the children were workers in their mothers’ wombs as the one entity and if the claims of the mothers of children were not received, the mothers’ rights to equality in the Constitutional law would be violated.
The high court, however, reversed the judgement of the administrative court because the current industrial accident insurance law definitively regulates that the beneficiary is the worker alive, and there are no comparison target so that the violation of rights to equality in the Constitutional law was not admitted.
Thus, the best solution to this conundrum is to amend the Industrial accident compensation insurance act to recover the blind spot. There are three legislation bills, one of which was discarded. They can be very useful references to direction of development in the industrial accident insurance law, and Lee Jung-Mi bill are specially notable. That bill admits the fetus’ capacity of enjoyment of rights and recognize the children as workers legislatively.
In addition, the industrial accident insurance is the subsequent remedial measures, so that there have to be the far-reaching reform to improve the maternity protection in the labour and social security acts.

목차

Ⅰ. 문제제기
Ⅱ. 장애아 등 산재보험 적용 여부에 대한 법원의 견해
Ⅲ. 장애아 산재보험 적용을 위한 입법론
Ⅳ. 맺으며
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문과 연관된 판례 (2)

  • 서울고등법원 2016. 5. 11. 선고 2015누31307 판결

    자세히 보기
  • 헌법재판소 2008. 7. 31. 선고 2004헌바81 전원재판부

    가. 민법 제762조는 `태아는 손해배상의 청구권에 관하여는 이미 출생한 것으로 본다.’라고 규정하고 있는바, 이 규정을 문면 그대로 해석할 경우 사산된 태아의 손해배상청구권을 인정할 여지가 있다. 그럼에도 불구하고 사산한 태아의 손해배상청구권이 부정되는 것은 법원이 민법 제762조를 해석함에 있어 생

    자세히 보기

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-336-003403792