지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제109호
- 발행연도
- 2018.9
- 수록면
- 373 - 407 (35page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2018.09.109.373
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
After the failure of Gapsin Coup(甲申政變), Kim Ok-kyun(金玉均), the leader of the Enlightenment Party, fled to Japan with his comrades. They wanted to rebuild their revolutionary power with Japan"s assistance and help. But Japanese Government never deal with them as the political refugee.
The Japanese Government, immediately after their refuge to Japan, denied the fact of their residence in Japan in order to avoid the responsibilities of participating in Kapsin Coup. The Government turned their face against them. But Japanese Government gradually recognized again value of Kim in the diplomatic big deal within Chosun. Because, at that time, the Dynasty was the center all the important imperial nations rushed into. Every imperial nation struggled to obtain its interest in Chosun. And so there were many inequal international agreements and military actions in Chosun such as the Korean-Russo Secret Agreement(朝露密約) and the Occupation of Kumun-do by Britain (巨文島事件). Now Japan also needed Kim’s value to have influence on Chosun. At that time, Chosun and Qing demanded that Kim should be delivered into Chosun for the responsibilities of the revolt. On the while, Japan tried Kim’s card to diplomatic negotiation with Qing Dynasty which was superior power in the Chosun after the failure of Kim’s Kapsin Coup. Therefore the problem of Kim Ok-kyun was magified in Japan. That was resisting the deal of Japanese Government by Kim and the dispatch a assassin of Chosun Government to kill Kim.
Moreover, if Kim had gone to another countries hostile to Japan, Japan could not have influenced on the Chosun’s problems. Japan could not permit its political asylum to another country. Japan also tried to revise inequal international agreements with powerful countries. If Kim had been expelled, Japan’s international status to have obtain agreements would have been damaged profoundly. Only one alternative was to be sent into reclusive Ogasawara Island(小笠原島) and Hokkaido(北海道).
As the diplomatic strategy of Japanese government was transformed into a hard line and getting ready to war against Qing in the early 1890s, they permitted Kim’s free dwelling or emigration but they kept watch his move.
This means that the diplomatic strategy of Japanese Government which tried to evade diplomatic dispute caused by Kime Ok-kyun’s problem was changed aggressive practical policy of Kim against Chosun and Qing at this time.
The Japanese Government, immediately after their refuge to Japan, denied the fact of their residence in Japan in order to avoid the responsibilities of participating in Kapsin Coup. The Government turned their face against them. But Japanese Government gradually recognized again value of Kim in the diplomatic big deal within Chosun. Because, at that time, the Dynasty was the center all the important imperial nations rushed into. Every imperial nation struggled to obtain its interest in Chosun. And so there were many inequal international agreements and military actions in Chosun such as the Korean-Russo Secret Agreement(朝露密約) and the Occupation of Kumun-do by Britain (巨文島事件). Now Japan also needed Kim’s value to have influence on Chosun. At that time, Chosun and Qing demanded that Kim should be delivered into Chosun for the responsibilities of the revolt. On the while, Japan tried Kim’s card to diplomatic negotiation with Qing Dynasty which was superior power in the Chosun after the failure of Kim’s Kapsin Coup. Therefore the problem of Kim Ok-kyun was magified in Japan. That was resisting the deal of Japanese Government by Kim and the dispatch a assassin of Chosun Government to kill Kim.
Moreover, if Kim had gone to another countries hostile to Japan, Japan could not have influenced on the Chosun’s problems. Japan could not permit its political asylum to another country. Japan also tried to revise inequal international agreements with powerful countries. If Kim had been expelled, Japan’s international status to have obtain agreements would have been damaged profoundly. Only one alternative was to be sent into reclusive Ogasawara Island(小笠原島) and Hokkaido(北海道).
As the diplomatic strategy of Japanese government was transformed into a hard line and getting ready to war against Qing in the early 1890s, they permitted Kim’s free dwelling or emigration but they kept watch his move.
This means that the diplomatic strategy of Japanese Government which tried to evade diplomatic dispute caused by Kime Ok-kyun’s problem was changed aggressive practical policy of Kim against Chosun and Qing at this time.
목차
머리말
1. 김옥균 망명의 파장(波長)과 동아시아 3국의 대응
2. 조선의 자객 파견과 일본의 김옥균 유배
3. 일본의 대청(對淸) 강경정책 전환과 김옥균의 처우 변화
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (22)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
김교신의 조선산 기독교에 대한 역사적 이해 : 조선혼과 조선심을 중심으로
한국기독교와 역사
2017 .09
-
근대 조선의 ‘탈중화’와 지역의식의 재구성
동방학
2017 .01
-
황국신민 양성을 위한 역사교육― 1944년 조선총독부편찬 『初等國史』를 중심으로 ―
日本語敎育
2017 .01
-
조선학교 선택에 있어 보이지 않는 경계선
재외한인연구
2018 .01
-
조선의 對日사절 파견과 대응양상의 변화(1876~1885) -흠차대신 파견을 중심으로-
한국사학보
2019 .11
-
식민지 시기 재조일본인의 출판활동과 조선인식
한국민족운동사연구
2018 .01
-
일제강점기 김옥균의 초상 : 김옥균 묘사에 나타난 한국 근대 문명인식의 지성사적 고찰
양명학
2018 .04
-
식민지 탐정문학과 제국의 사법체계- 김내성 일본어 탐정문학의 조선어 번역과정을 중심으로
한중인문학연구
2018 .01
-
1940년대 초 김광균의 비평적 시선과 서정시 : ‘서정’ 불능의 조건에서 서정시 쓰기
국어문학
2017 .11
-
김수영 시인의 연보 고찰 (1) ― 출생에서부터 일본 유학까지
한국시학회 학술대회 논문집
2021 .06
-
김옥균의 제1차 일본 방문 활동과 그 목적
한국학연구
2024 .02
-
보성전문학교에서 김일성종합대학으로 : 식민지 지식인 김광진의 생애와 경제사 연구
역사학보
2016 .12
-
서양인의 조선여행 기록문을 통한 근대 식생활사(食生活史) 연구
한국식생활문화학회지
2016 .01
-
재일사회와 유교문화의 공과(功過) - 가부장적 유교문화에 대한 재일여성의 비판과 극복 담론을 중심으로 -
일본어문학
2022 .08
-
청말 출사대신의 일기에 나타난 일본해군 : 대만출병부터 나가사키 사건까지
해항도시문화교섭학
2021 .10
-
조선후기 ‘원균 이미지’의 변화상과 ‘원균 비판’의 정치성
역사와교육
2016 .01
-
조선 여자
구보학보
2019 .01
-
김현의 김춘수 시 비평 연구
현대문학의 연구
2021 .01
-
1920년대 조선사업공채 정책 변화와 재원조달의 부실화
한국사연구
2019 .06
-
현존 김려⋅김선 형제 저작의 문헌학적 재검토
민족문화연구
2023 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0