메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김상태 (성균관대학교) 류태창 (우송대학교)
저널정보
한국주거환경학회 주거환경 住居環境 통권 제16권 제4호 (통권 제42호)
발행연도
2018.12
수록면
197 - 214 (18page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to analyze the Business Improvement Districts(BIDs), which have been widely adopted by cities in the U.S. and other developed countries as governance for regeneration of urban commercial districts. Cases of the BIDs in the U.S. cities including the City of New York have inspired researchers, policymakers and urban planning practitioners. From 1990s, the BIDs were accepted as as alternative policy measure for revitalization of urban commercial areas. The literature generally defines BIDs as pubic-private partnerships or governance system which is to manage urban commercial districts by stakeholders including tenants, merchants and local government. The focus of management is the improvement of commercial environment and amenities in the district. The main source of financial resource is the fees from stakeholders. This study is to analyze the Long Island Partnership BID in the City of New York, and the Better Bankside BID in the Metropolitan London under each nation"s legal institution. In the recent years, the Korean government and legislature have been in the process of constructing new statutes for BID-like districts. From the case and institutional studies of the U.S. and the U.K., this study suggests the following recommendations: To introduce BIDs in Korea, a new statute is inevitable; the stakeholders like tenants and merchants should bear, at least a part of, the financial burden; legal arrangements should be introduced to ensure accountability of the BID management; appripriate authorities and authonomy should be endowed in managing BIDs; and the government should constitute education and training system for managers of BIDs.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 연구의 배경과 목적
Ⅱ. 선행연구 검토 : BID의 정의 및 발전 과정을 중심으로
Ⅲ. 법적 제도와 (운영) 사례 비교 분석
Ⅳ. 정책적 시사점
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-595-000322735