메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

The Study on the Policy Change of Long-term Care Insurance in Korea (2008-2018) : Focused on comparison with major OECD countries
Recommendations
Search
Questions

한국 노인장기요양보험의 정책변화에 대한 분석(2008-2018) : OECD 주요국과의 비교를 중심으로

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Yongpil Moon (국민건강보험공단) ChangLyul Jung (단국대학교)
Journal
Institute of Social Sciences Chungnam National University Journal of Social Science Vol.30 No.1 KCI Accredited Journals
Published
2019.1
Pages
45 - 66 (22page)
DOI
10.16881/jss.2019.01.30.1.45

Usage

cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
The Study on the Policy Change of Long-term Care Insurance in Korea (2008-2018) : Focused on comparison with major OECD countries
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
This study examines patterns of services over the last 30 years, such as the expansion of home-based service from traditional facility service by reforming long-term care service through OECD countries. We analyzed whether the trend of using long-term care services in major OECD countries is similar to that of Korea. To do this, we applied the Gori et al. (2016) analysis framework and examined the comparison between Korea and OECD countries in terms of policy mix, coverage and intensity. Over the past 30 years, long-term care services in OECD countries have shown an increasing tendency due to population aging and service users. In addition, there has been a tendency to converge trends in the use of home-based/facility services. In other words, there was a tendency to expand service coverage and to decrease service intensity, while regarding facility service, there was a tendency to reduce service coverage and to enhance service intensity. On the other hand, since the introduction of the social insurance system in 2008, Korea has expanded service coverage and strengthened service intensity in both home-based and facility services, which is different from trends in OECD countries. Based on this analysis, the study needed to find a suitable institutional path to the reality of Korea considering pattern changes of long-term care services. In addition, it was presented as a policy statement that it is necessary to clarify service types according to the long-term care service user rating and to seek a systematic route of Korea considering the change of a service utilization trend of long-term care insurance for the elderly.

Contents

1. 서론
2. 이론적 배경
3. 연구방법 및 분석틀
4. OECD 주요국과 한국의 장기요양서비스 정책변화 분석
5. 결론 및 정책적 함의
참고문헌

References (0)

Add References

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Frequently Viewed Together

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-306-000435918