메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Shahar Gindi (Beit Berl Academic College) Avital Pilpel (University of Haifa)
저널정보
강원대학교 인문과학연구소 Journal of Humanities Therapy Journal of Humanities Therapy Vol.6 No.2
발행연도
2015.12
수록면
1 - 23 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Philosophical counselling is largely divided into those who accept and those who reject the medical model. From the latter stream, there are those who believe therapy is ineffective and that returning to open-ended, Socratic dialogues is the key towards greater insight and mental well-being. The first stream accepts psychotherapy is useful, but believes it does not pay enough attention to clients" metaphysical and moral views and their logical consistency. This stream tends to follow one of two traditions: logical investigations or existential philosophy. We suggest that this emphasis has underrepresented many useful philosophical approaches. We propose Contemporary Philosophical Counselling (CPC), a new approach designed as an aid to psychotherapists. CPC targets philosophical alongside psychological well-being with a well-defined target population. CPC focuses on building a systematic world-view in a collaborative discussion, informed by the plethora of philosophical streams in modern philosophy. Case examples are brought to illustrate this developing practice.

목차

Abstract
1. The Relationship between Philosophical Counselling and Psychotherapy Socratic, Existentialist, and Eclectic Approaches to Philosophical Counselling
2. Bridging the Gap
3. Case Examples
4. Some Pitfalls to Avoid
5. Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-001-000619747