메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Tianqun Pan (Nanjing University)
저널정보
강원대학교 인문과학연구소 Journal of Humanities Therapy Journal of Humanities Therapy Vol.11 No.2
발행연도
2020.12
수록면
67 - 80 (14page)
DOI
10.33252/jht.2020.12.11.2.67

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Every mode of philosophical practice is based on some philosophical theory. Thought analysis, which is based on analytic philosophy, is the philosophical practice of clarifying an individual’s thoughts and beliefs through Socratic dialogue. Logic is an important tool employed by thought analysts, and during making clients to think clearly thought analysts should follow the principles of value neutrality and ethic neutrality. With the advent of hyperconnected societies, people are increasingly encountering spiritual and psychological problems. Thought analysis can be employed to solve spiritual problems, which include not only an individual’s suffering but also disputes or conflicts caused by differing beliefs among people. Thought analysis, however, has its limitations. We must surpass these limitations to enhance the power and efficacy of thought analysis.

목차

abstract
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Thought Analysis and Its Philosophy
Ⅲ. Thought Analysis in Practice: How and Where
Ⅳ. Overcoming the Limitations of Thought Analysis
Ⅴ. Conclusions
References

참고문헌 (9)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-001-001437115