메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국중앙영어영문학회 영어영문학연구 영어영문학연구 제57권 제4호
발행연도
2015.1
수록면
373 - 392 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper proposes to classify and analyze the debates on the violence in the poetry of Ted Hughes. Hughes’s early poetry in his oeuvre, which had the epithet of “poetry of violence”, enabled him to cross the threshold of a major English poet of our century. Muir’s phrase ‘admirable violence’ which he used in relation to the imagery of Hughes triggered the debates on the violence. One of the most heated debates concerning the violence in his poetry was on the question whether violence was his main theme or just a subordinate element in a poem’s meaning. Arguing against Rawson’s opinion Hainsworth asserted that violence was not the focus of Hughes’s poetry, though Hughes expressed violence very powerfully in his poems. Rawson counterattacked Hainsworth by refuting his points at issue one by one and insisted that violence was the crucial theme in Hughes’s poetry, though in some poems Hughes showed a humane attitude. Most of the critics who thought that his poetry had a preoccupation with violence as an end-in-itself underestimated his poetry, while the critics who appreciated it regarded violence as a symbol or a metaphor for a deep human psyche or an essential energy of the universe. Hughes himself interpreted ferocious animals in his poetry not just as animals but as symbols of some nature spirit or of man’s nature ‘shoved down to the id’ or of what the reader might want to select.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (22)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0