메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국경영법률학회 경영법률 경영법률 제19권 제2호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
583 - 615 (33page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Section 1(1) EPA 1970 implies an equality clause into all contracts of employment which do not already contain one. An equality clause, according to section 1(2) EPA 1970, is a provision relating to the terms, not just pay, of a contract under which a woman is employed. The clause has effect where a woman is: (1) employed on like work with a man in the same employment; (2) employed on work rated as equivalent with that of a man in the same employment; (3) employed on work which, not being work in (1) or (2), is, in terms of the demands made upon her, of equal value to that of a man in the same employment. The comparator needs to be selected by the complaint and be in the same employment as the claimant. This does not mean that the claimant can just choose an artificial or arbitrary group, in principle the comparison should be between the advantaged and the disadvantaged group. Section 1(3) EPA 1970 provides a 'material factor' or 'material difference' defence to an equal pay claim. This defence will an employer if they are able to show that the difference in pay is genuinely due to a material factor which is not the difference of sex. In cases involving like work or work rated as equivalent, the factor 'must' be a material difference between the woman's case and the amn's. However, in equal value claims the material factor 'may' be such a material difference.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (21)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0