메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국재산법학회 재산법연구 재산법연구 제27권 제1호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
85 - 110 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Japanese former civil law is enacted in base of French civil law by Bossonade. Japanese existing civil law has two types about co-obligation. one is the 'indivisible obligation', the other is the 'joint obligation. Korean civil law is very similar to Japanese that about the article of co-obligation. This paper is concerned about co-obligation focused on joint lessee, demonstrated Korean & Japanese civil law about co-obligation. Japanese civil law about it is compared to Korean that in this paper. In Korea, joint lessees bear the responsibility 'jointly' by civil code §654. But in Japan, their responsibility is treated case by case theoretically. The divided obligation is a fundamental rule in co-obligation. But It can be the indivisible obligation, joint obligation and ungenuine joint obligation case by case. They are different one after another delicately. That is, in japan, civil legislator tried to pursue a flexibility in concerned of 'joint lessees.'We have to give attention to that the division in them is being collapsed. Indivisible obligation and joint obligation is treated samely in reality. And we cannot discover easily bases that separate joint obligation from ungenuine joint obligation. I wish you could understand it easily and clearly by this paper.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (57)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0