메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국비교형사법학회 비교형사법연구 비교형사법연구 제12권 제2호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
183 - 216 (34page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In recent there is a lively controversy surrounding plea-bargaining in Korea. It takes focus on whether plea-bargaining must be introduced into our criminal legal system or not, to increase the efficiency of criminal justice in general. By the way summary procedure(summary order procedure and summary judgement procedure) has many problems in the point of legal theory and its application. Therefore it does not play its original role of handling simple criminal cases rapidly in the present. Under these circumstances it is well timed to examine whether it is necessary and proper to introduce plea-bargaining into summary procedure or not to make it function according with its purpose. This paper is based on such a recognition. Some following subjects are treated here. First, this paper mentions the fundamental values which plea-bargaining pursues in criminal procedure. Second, it explains some examples of foreign countries and checks its characteristics and implications. Third, it treats the controversy status surrounding plea-bargaining in Korea. Fourth, based on such a discussion it reviews whether it is necessary and proper to introduce plea-bargaining into summary procedure or not. My answer as a result of review is that it's not. Introducing plea-bargaining is a short solution in the viewpoint of our situations and conditions. Thus, I think that it is desirable for the present to associate the debate on plea-bargaining with the other discussions on the improvement of criminal justice.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (34)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0