지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (3)
2015
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Capital market & Financial Investment Business law went into effect in February 2009. It supplemented and improved the regulatory framework for unfair trade practices to enhance the credibility of the market and protect investors. Thus, in this paper, the regulation on unfair trade practices in capital market and the legislation of the regulation on unfair trade practices in abroad were reviewed and compared with our legislation and then the improvement plans for the problems relating the regulation on unfair trade practices under the capital markets law were suggested. Financial Services Commission considers to adopt administrative fines for the unfair trading practices in Korea. However, unfair trading such as manipulation and insider trading is serious criminal crime which should be dealt with criminal penalty.
Moreover, there are serious problems in the investigative procedure for these crimes. For example, the evidences collected by administrative agencies are inadmissible in criminal trail and it takes too much time for the administrative procedure. When reforming the investigative procedure, we have to consider these principles. We should be able to use the evidences which are collected at the early stage of the case. The administrative agencies should be able to communicate efficiently with prosecutors from the beginning. The result of the administrative research should be shared with prosecutors. And the rights of the suspect should be protected. While it is ideal to establish a new agency for the investigation of unfair trading,we can use the research official which is already regulated in Capital Markets Act. Adopting the administrative fines without solving these problems of the investigative system would cause bigger problems. The crime investigation for unfair trading would be impossible because the evidences from the administrative procedure are inadmissible at criminal trial. And the high amount of administrative fine should not substitute criminal penalty as its procedure is simple and easy comparing criminal procedure.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (49)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0