메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
고려대학교 중국학연구소 중국학논총 중국학논총 제58호
발행연도
2017.1
수록면
195 - 213 (19page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Studies on the literary theories of many historical periods and literary schools are often distorted by the biases and preconceptions of those studying them. This is difficult to avoid, and even effects the research of some erudite scholars. I assert that this problem is particularly prominent in studies on the relationship between late Ming literature and the Wang Yangming School of Mind. While there are similarities between the political and intellectual environments of the late Ming and the 20th century May 4th movement they are often the subject of forced conflations. In view of these factors, we should follow Gong’s call to ‘adjust our strategy and broaden our perspective in order to renew our efforts to understand this period.’ Although we need to reassess the relationship between late Ming literature and Wang Studies, we should not deny that this was an era marked by considerable literary achievement, and should pursue an evidence based approach to determine its value and significance. In summary, I argue that the emphasis on the relationship between late Ming intellectual trends and Wang Studies of May 4th e ra scholars and their successor s catered to the needs of the day, and to this end these scholars have been guilty of consciously overlooking discrepancies and complications. Hence it is now apparent that studies in this field remain inadequate in terms of their veracity and multi-dimensionality.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (37)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0