메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
이화여자대학교 법학연구소 법학논집 법학논집 제9권 제2호
발행연도
2005.1
수록면
187 - 201 (15page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
One tends to have fear for doing something that one has never done before. To Korea this fear remained too long, considering that Korea could finally raise the first WTO complaint only in July 1997 after having already been complained against by other countries in five cases since the establishment of the WTO. In addition, this fear had by Korea was particularly stronger towards the United States which was in special security relationship with Korea. Despite the clear fact that over a decade the United States had been taking illegal anti-dumping regulations upon Korean major exports including color TVs, Korea was reluctant to raise WTO complaints and request the establishment of panel against the United States. However, through experiences of WTO settlements in early disputes, Korea came to realize that it does not need to have fear for the WTO solution because of concerns for special relationship between Korea and the United States, and that benefits of depoliticization of international commercial disputes tend to be greater for those states in such relationship. Indeed, the WTO DSP solution provided an excellent excuse to the US Government, which was otherwise politically unable to revoke the anti-dumping measure by itself due to strong political pressures from domestic interest groups including labor unions. To Korea and the US the WTO DSP should not remain as a last resort in settling trade disputes but it must function as an alternative that is readily available to decision makers of both countries. In these days, one sees that Korea proceeds to WTO DSP without unnecessary hesitations in such cases as DRAM Anti-dumping, Stainless Steel Anti-dumping, Linepipe Safeguard, Byrd Amendment, and DRAM Countervailing against the US. This shows that Korea became an active participant in the WTO dispute settlement system and is ready to receive benefits of ‘depoliticization' of trade disputes arising from the system. Fear was finally overcome. Given the fact that Korean export is steadily growing and that China joined the WTO, it is expected that Korea would accelerate this move of 'practical legalism' in the future.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0