메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국외국어대학교 법학연구소 외법논집 외법논집 제33권 제1호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
461 - 489 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Under the present law, a penalty defaulter works at a prison workshop within a given period. However, as the imprisonment for the punishment of failure to pay the penalty lead to unusual results of restoring imprisonment on the fine default just from the fine penalty that intended to avoid a short-term bad effect, people without economic strength end up with sentencing imprisonment on the fine default, and the defaulter rather favor a suspended sentence on imprisonment. Recently, after accepting criticism on regarding imprisonment on the fine default as the restoring execution, government submitted an exemption law to the National Assembly in order to introduce community service instead of imprisonment for the defaulter on economic grounds. The exemption law includes a procedure that a public prosecutor approves the community service applied by a penalty defaulter to execute a sentence to perform community service in advance of imprisonment. However, the exemption law asking approval of a public prosecutor is quite different comparing with previous suggestion intended to introduce community service order system as an alternative execution instead of imprisonment on the fine default. Nevertheless, a strong insistence on whether a public prosecutor or a court of justice approves it confronts each other. As mentioned above, the main point of theoretical and practical confrontation exists in whether community service is an alternative execution of fine penalty or a new restoring execution on the fine default. Considering foreign legislative examples and hands-on-background, several prior legislative managements that are not mentioned in the exemption law are prerequisite at least in understanding all of the exemption law procedures as implied in the exemption law. Even if that a public prosecutor admits and executes community service by a penalty defaulter according to the rules of the exemption law without prior legislative managements may be of advantage to the people without economic strength, changing a judicial decision without a court of justice being involved in the case will be unjust. Furthermore, rather than just introducing the community service order system as a restoring execution of imprisonment on the fine default, it needs to make decision on whether the exemption law is to be induced or not after taking everything into consideration, such as daily fines system, monthly installment of fines system, and suspended sentence system for fine penalty, which have been discussed as improvement plans. Currently, the Ministry of Justice proceeds to revise laws to improve the whole punishment system. Like the exemption law, rather than preparing for a special case for punishment law as an alternative mean of imprisonment, it will be an adequate scheme to make the purpose of legislation for the exemption law to be prescribed in penal code by investigating and connecting the legislative project to legal exchange work of the Ministry of Justice.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (34)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0