지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
As more than 50 years have passed since the criminal law legislation in 1953, its status as a fundamental law has been degraded due to too many special criminal laws. These special criminal laws with too severe penalties put liability of the criminal law in the shade and deteriorate its characteristic as the last supplementary means. Some measures are being come up with to make more effective resocialization program and better community treatment system because criticism is raised that the existing penalties have little effect on convicts. To solve these problems, our hands-on experience, other countries' experience and scholar's opinion should be reflected enough.
The first change to be made in the Korean criminal law is the abolishment of the death penalty. Second, all special criminal laws should be abolished so that a sentence should be passed only according to the criminal law. But, an exceptional special criminal law should be enacted only for the crimes which should not be treated by the sole criminal law. Third, severe penalties of special criminal laws and of the heavy penalty-oriented criminal law should be reduced to be fit for liability, which is proved well by the tendency in courts that excessive martinetism turns into paternalism. It is noticeable that the lighter a penalty is, the higher its influence is. In Scandinavian countries, light penalties improve influence of penalties. The upper limit of sentences the court can pass controls the court's discretion to examine an offense. Fourth, the existing life imprisonment cannot be the alternative of the death penalty. The absolute life imprisonment and the existing life imprisonment should co-exist so that only the criminals subject to death penalty should be sentenced to the former. The hard labor difference between imprisonment and confinement should be eliminated. It is a big progress that fine and detention are to be abolished. Fifth, the day-fine system should be introduced. Sixth, the requisites for disqualification and lapsed probation should be improved to prevent unfair effect of law. Seventh, the wrong gap between imprisonment and probation should be eliminated. Eighth, the defamation sentence should not be categorized into the general type of penalties but it is enough that just the corresponding law prescribes it. Ninth, the community treatment system should be improved. Tenth, the criminal law should intervene only when the society defense to maintain the social order is impossible. Therefore, the illegal activities including administrative law violation, from which the society can be defended through other means, should not be considered a crime. Although penalties are the easy means for the social defense, their intervention should be always used as the last means to resort. The trend of new crimes should be observed closely and their intervention should be restrained as much as possible even if they are necessary. Only when it is unavoidable, new crimes can be the subject of penalties.
The first change to be made in the Korean criminal law is the abolishment of the death penalty. Second, all special criminal laws should be abolished so that a sentence should be passed only according to the criminal law. But, an exceptional special criminal law should be enacted only for the crimes which should not be treated by the sole criminal law. Third, severe penalties of special criminal laws and of the heavy penalty-oriented criminal law should be reduced to be fit for liability, which is proved well by the tendency in courts that excessive martinetism turns into paternalism. It is noticeable that the lighter a penalty is, the higher its influence is. In Scandinavian countries, light penalties improve influence of penalties. The upper limit of sentences the court can pass controls the court's discretion to examine an offense. Fourth, the existing life imprisonment cannot be the alternative of the death penalty. The absolute life imprisonment and the existing life imprisonment should co-exist so that only the criminals subject to death penalty should be sentenced to the former. The hard labor difference between imprisonment and confinement should be eliminated. It is a big progress that fine and detention are to be abolished. Fifth, the day-fine system should be introduced. Sixth, the requisites for disqualification and lapsed probation should be improved to prevent unfair effect of law. Seventh, the wrong gap between imprisonment and probation should be eliminated. Eighth, the defamation sentence should not be categorized into the general type of penalties but it is enough that just the corresponding law prescribes it. Ninth, the community treatment system should be improved. Tenth, the criminal law should intervene only when the society defense to maintain the social order is impossible. Therefore, the illegal activities including administrative law violation, from which the society can be defended through other means, should not be considered a crime. Although penalties are the easy means for the social defense, their intervention should be always used as the last means to resort. The trend of new crimes should be observed closely and their intervention should be restrained as much as possible even if they are necessary. Only when it is unavoidable, new crimes can be the subject of penalties.
목차
Ⅰ. 사법제도개혁을 위한 한국의 상황
Ⅱ. 한국 형법의 개혁에 관한 배경
Ⅲ. 한국형법의 개혁방향과 개혁내용
Ⅳ. 결론
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국형법 개정의 올바른 방향 -형법총칙을 중심으로-
비교형사법연구
2012 .01
-
사회변동과 형법의 과제
비교형사법연구
2010 .01
-
조선시대의 형사법제 연구 : 조선 형사법제와 현행 형법과의 비교법적 검토(각론)
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2016 .12
-
[형사특별법 정비방안(9)] 금융/재정/노동/사회풍속 분야
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2008 .12
-
형사특별법의 입법구조와 이론적 기초
비교형사법연구
2009 .01
-
행정형법론의 비판적 검토
형사법연구
2009 .01
-
한국의 경제범죄 관련 형벌법규의 현황과 주요 내용
비교형사법연구
2009 .01
-
中國 刑法上 犯罪過程에서의 犯罪形態
법학연구
2005 .06
-
군형법 제정의 역사적 배경과 관련 문제점
군사
2012 .03
-
조선시대의 형사법제 연구 : 총칙의 현대 형사법 편제에 따른 재정립
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2015 .12
-
형사정책연구 30년의 성과와 과제(II) : 형사법 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2019 .03
-
법정형의 문제점과 정비방안
형사정책연구
2007 .09
-
범죄피해자 보호제도에 관한 고찰
피해자학연구
2004 .01
-
일본개정형법가안이 제정형법에 미친 영향과 현행 형법해석론의 문제점
형사법연구
2003 .01
-
朝鮮朝大明律直解의 刑法總則的條項의 分析
형사정책연구
2003 .09
-
몽골 형법의 개정과 형벌제도
동북아법연구
2019 .01
-
형법각칙 개정연구 [9] : 우리나라 및 주요 국가의 형법개정 동향
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2007 .12
-
사형제도의 개선방안
법학연구
2005 .11
-
형사법의 재정비를 위한 기본적 성찰
동아법학
2005 .12
-
중국형법의 개정과 그 문제점에 대한 연구
법학연구
2010 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-360-002115528