메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background and Objectives There have been various approaches introduced for endoscopic thyroidectomy. This study evaluates and compares the surgical outcomes of two such approaches: the unilateral axillo-breast approach (UABA) with gas and the gasless transaxillary approach (TA). Subjects and Method We retrospectively analyzed 279 patients who underwent endoscopic thyroidectomy via UABA with gas or gasless TA from March 2008 to August 2012. Studied variables were clinicopathologic data, surgical outcomes, complications, and cosmetic satisfactions. Results Of the 279 patients, 195 (69.9%) underwent UABA with gas and 84 (30.1%) underwent gasless TA. All of the variables related to clinicopathologic characteristics showed no significant differences between the two groups. The mean operation time was significantly shorter in the UABA with gas group (131.76±44.37 min) than in the gasless TA group (191.01± 55.90 min) (p<0.001). The mean postoperative pain Visual Analogue Scale scores in the UABA with gas group were 2.61±0.96 and 1.85±0.79, respectively, and those in the gasless TA group were 3.12±1.02 and 2.17±0.76, respectively, at 1 and 3 days after surgery. Incidences of postoperative complications were similar except for the higher rate of seroma in the gasless TA group. Cosmetic satisfaction scores of UABA with gas were higher than those of the gasless TA. Conclusion UABA with gas may be a good option for endoscopic thyroidectomy because this approach is less invasive than the gasless TA is. Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2016;59(12):848-55

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (24)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0