지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Although antidumping duties were allowed under the GATT, they were seldom imposed until the early 1970s. Beginning from the mid-1970s, antidumping duties have been actively imposed. The investigation, as well as the imposition, of antidumping duties may act as strong protectionist measures. Although antidumping duties were almost entirely used by the developed countries up until the mid-1980s, a few developing countries have begun to impose antidumping duties since the late 1980s. Many others have followed this trend since the late 1990s. Korea is one of the few developing countries, which started investigations of antidumping duties in the late 1980s and has used those measures actively since then. Against this backdrop, this study analyzes the macroeconomic factors that explain antidumping decisions in the Korea. To this, cointegration verification was conducted based on the use of Johansen verification method to define the existence (or non-existence) of long-term balance relationship among variables. Johansen's cointegration test results show that there is a long run equilibrium relationship between antidumping tariffs and unemployment rate and GDP growth rate. The result of analysis indicates that the unemployment rate and the GDP growth rate affected the Korea's antidumping investigation decisions.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (20)
참고문헌 신청
Baldwin, Robert E / 1994 / An Analysis of ITC Decisions in Antidumping, Countervailing Duty and Safeguard Cases / Review of World Economics 130 (2)
Bown, Chad P / 2008 / The WTO and Antidumping in Developing Countries / Economics and Politics 20 (2)
Bruce A. Blonigen / 2001 / Antidumping and Retaliation Threats
Hansen, Wendy L / 1996 / Cumulation and ITC Decision Making: The Sum of the Parts is Greater than the Whole / Economic Inquiry 34
Johansen, S / 1988 / Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors / Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 12
Bown, Chad P / 2008 / The WTO and Antidumping in Developing Countries / Economics and Politics 20 (2)
Bruce A. Blonigen / 2001 / Antidumping and Retaliation Threats
Hansen, Wendy L / 1996 / Cumulation and ITC Decision Making: The Sum of the Parts is Greater than the Whole / Economic Inquiry 34
Johansen, S / 1988 / Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors / Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 12
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
중국의 對한국 반덤핑 규제에 관한 결정요인 분석
무역학회지
2009 .11
-
U.S. and Antidumping Procedure
저스티스
1990 .12
-
An Economic Elucidation of the Antidumping Issue : Each Party's Actions and Discriminatory Treatment to Chinese Exports in Foreign Countries
지역개발연구
2005 .06
-
Injury Decisions on Antidumping Duties under the WTO
한국관세학회 학술대회
2004 .05
-
일본의 반덤핑제도에 관한 연구
통상법률
2010 .10
-
중국 반덤핑 제소의 경제적 효과에 관한 연구
무역학회지
2009 .02
-
WTO 반덤핑관세제도 개정협상의 쟁점 및 대응방안
관세학회지
2005 .08
-
한국 반덤핑(Antidumping)제소 조치의 전략적 행동과 제소 철회 결정요인 분석에 관한 실증적 연구
관세학회지
2008 .08
-
美國과 EU의 反덤핑關稅 賦課節次 比較硏究
무역학회지
1999 .10
-
A STUDY ON THE EFFECTS OF FOREIGN ANTIDUMPING DUTY PETITIONS ON THE VALUES OF KOREAN FIRMS
한국관세학회 학술대회
2009 .06
-
EU의 무역구제조치 결정요인 분석: 반덤핑 및 상계관세부과조사를 중심으로
무역연구
2016 .01
-
중국 반덤핑법 연구
국제경제법연구
2008 .12
-
미국반덤핑법의 적용에 관한 사례연구
통상정보연구
2008 .09
-
ITC 반덤핑판정에 대한 CIT 및 미국연방법원의 해석 : 동종상품 여부의 해석을 중심으로
무역학회지
2006 .11
-
반덤핑법에 대한 경제논리적 타당성 고찰
경영법률
2005 .01
-
미국의 반덤핑조치에 대한 대응방안 연구
미국헌법연구
2012 .12
-
Comparison between Antidumping and Countervailing Duties: The Case of theUnited States International Trade Commission, 1995-1999
Asian International Studies Review
2004 .01
-
Revocation of Antidumping Orders under the New U.S. "Sunset" Review Procedures
통상법률
1998 .08
-
유럽연합(EU)의 對 한국 반덤핑 조치 분석 : 철강 부문 사례를 중심으로
무역학회지
2005 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0