메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
중앙대학교 법학연구원 法學論文集 法學論文集 제32권 제1호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
191 - 209 (19page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Attorney's fee is one of the most delicate issues in the area of the legal ethics. It is now recognized that attorney's fee is basically ruled by the invisible hands by the free market. However, no country let the attorney's fee run by only 'the invisible hands'. Some countries like Germany set the attorney's fee by the national legislation, but most countries let the bar association rule by themselves. However, when a controversy on the attorney's fee is arisen, the court should provide ultimate solution. There are basically three kinds of attorney' fee ; fixed charge, hourly charge and contingent fee schedule. There are also several variation too. Most controversial is the contingent fee schedule. Contingent fee has significant role as poor people can have access to attorney's service. Also, under the contingent fee schedule, lawyers have strong incentive to work hard. However, it has also negative aspects. Frivolous lawsuits are brought by the lawyers who are playing some kind of lottery in multiple suits. Therefore, some states of the United States limits the scope of the contingent fee schedule. Basic rule is that attorney's fee should be 'reasonable'. There are several court decisions which could provide some answer for the question of how much is enough reasonable. The article also deals with various other issues of attorney's fee.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (9)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0