메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Choi, Chul-Hwan (Kyung Hee University) Kang, Sun-Jae (Manchester University) Itoh, Maki (Hosei University)
저널정보
한국체육과학회 한국체육과학회지 한국체육과학회지 제28권 제5호 (인문사회과학 편)
발행연도
2019.10
수록면
663 - 674 (12page)
DOI
10.35159/kjss.2019.10.28.5.663

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
To understand the identity of sport management programs, it was necessary to examine why undergraduate college students choose their majors and how much they are committed to their majors. This study analyzed the differences of educational motivations and commitments between undergraduate college students majoring in sport management and students majoring in business. With over 300 college students(n=316) participated in this study, the Multivariate Analysis of Variances (MANOVA) was performed to measure differences between groups after ensuring the validity and reliability of the instrument. The results revealed that there were significant differences between groups on (a) social opportunities, (b) intellectual curiosity, (c) normative/expectations, and (d) enjoyment, and (e) affective commitment, while there are no differences on (a) task value, (b) career/financial, (c) self-discovery, and (d) continuous commitment. Specifically, students majoring sport management reported higher scores on social opportunities, enjoyment, and affective commitment, and students majoring business showed greater scores on intellectual curiosity and normative/expectations. Given that there were obvious differences regarding educational motivations and commitments between majors from students’ perspective, this study could contribute to establish the identity of sport management independent of other academic programs and to suggest a good standard in differentiating the unique qualities of a major.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Method
Ⅲ. Results
Ⅳ. Discussion and Conclusions
Ⅴ. Limitations & Future Study
References

참고문헌 (29)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-692-001319545