지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제116호
- 발행연도
- 2020.6
- 수록면
- 161 - 208 (48page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2020.06.116.161
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Attempted in this article is to determine the goal behind the Goguryeo people’s construction of fortresses(Chaekseong, 柵城), as described in the Goguryeo section[高句麗本紀] of Samguk Sagi(三國史記) as well as other sources including the Yi Ta-in Tomb Epitaph[李他仁墓誌銘]. Exactly when it began, and how it contributed to the reinforcement of Goguryeo’s control of the Duman-gang river area in early phases of the dynasty are the primary focus of this article.
Chaekseong fortresses were usually known as security facilities built in today’s Honchun(琿春) region of China, in order to enforce Goguryeo’s ruling of indigenous tribes in the Duman-gang river area such as Northern Okjeo(北沃沮). However, prior studies showed the tendency of relying too much upon known records and Goguryeo mountain fortress vestiges, and examination focused on the tribes which were targeted as the objects of control such as Northern Okjeo has been rare. In this article, the status of cultural bodies such as Northern Okjeo and the geological meaning of the Chaekseong fortresses’ locations are objects of a closer look.
Examined first are records of king Taejo-wang(太祖王) visiting the fortresses in the 1st century as well as the nature of the action called ‘Su(守),’ which both revealed themselves to be the key factors in controlling the area. All the facilities visited and patrolled were meant to reinforce the Goguryeo government’s control of resident groups in several regions: the Yeonbyeon area & the Ha’al-ha river, west to the Honchun Ildaega region; the Honchun-ha river and the Dong’nyeong region in the northeast; and the region from the Kraskino area to the lower areas of the Subun-ha river in the east. All the fortresses were constructed on vital traffic points.
Meanwhile, “new fortresses[新城] in the northeast” described in later sources seems to have been a result derived from a necessity to supplement the existing control system, as the Sukshin(肅愼) tribes in the northwest was newly emerging in the region.
Chaekseong fortresses were usually known as security facilities built in today’s Honchun(琿春) region of China, in order to enforce Goguryeo’s ruling of indigenous tribes in the Duman-gang river area such as Northern Okjeo(北沃沮). However, prior studies showed the tendency of relying too much upon known records and Goguryeo mountain fortress vestiges, and examination focused on the tribes which were targeted as the objects of control such as Northern Okjeo has been rare. In this article, the status of cultural bodies such as Northern Okjeo and the geological meaning of the Chaekseong fortresses’ locations are objects of a closer look.
Examined first are records of king Taejo-wang(太祖王) visiting the fortresses in the 1st century as well as the nature of the action called ‘Su(守),’ which both revealed themselves to be the key factors in controlling the area. All the facilities visited and patrolled were meant to reinforce the Goguryeo government’s control of resident groups in several regions: the Yeonbyeon area & the Ha’al-ha river, west to the Honchun Ildaega region; the Honchun-ha river and the Dong’nyeong region in the northeast; and the region from the Kraskino area to the lower areas of the Subun-ha river in the east. All the fortresses were constructed on vital traffic points.
Meanwhile, “new fortresses[新城] in the northeast” described in later sources seems to have been a result derived from a necessity to supplement the existing control system, as the Sukshin(肅愼) tribes in the northwest was newly emerging in the region.
목차
머리말
1. 태조왕대(太祖王代) 고구려의 두만강 유역 진출과 책성(柵城)
2. 두만강 유역과 연해주의 단결(團結)-크로우노프카 문화
3. 서천왕대(西川王代)의 신성(新城)과 고구려의 두만강 유역 지배
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (57)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
渤海 東京 地域의 歷史的 淵源과 地域性
고구려발해연구
2017 .07
-
두만강 하류 지역의 역사 전개와 특징
백산학보
2021 .12
-
고구려의 동해안 방면 교통로와 물류 유통
동국사학
2022 .08
-
두만강 유역 고구려 성곽의 분포현황과 지방통치의 양상
역사문화연구
2017 .01
-
高句麗 遺民 〈李他仁墓誌銘〉의 재판독 및 주요 쟁점 검토
한국고대사연구
2017 .03
-
고고자료로 본 백산말갈과 고구려의 책성
동북아역사논총
2018 .09
-
北沃沮의 기원과 실체에 관한 高句麗의 두만강 유역 進出
한국고대사연구
2018 .09
-
고구려와 북조의 조공관계 성격
한국사학보
2019 .05
-
高句麗 遺民 李他仁의 族源과 柵城 褥薩 授與 배경에 대한 고찰
대구사학
2017 .08
-
고구려 ‘남평양(南平壤)’ 위치와 변천에 대한 검토
전북사학
2022 .11
-
고구려 ‘도성제’론의 궤적과 함의
역사와현실
2016 .12
-
임진강·한탄강 유역의 고구려 지명과 그 의미 - 경기도 연천 지역을 중심으로 -
사학연구
2019 .06
-
고구려의 韓半島 中部地域 지배와 漢城 別都의 건설
한국고대사연구
2020 .09
-
고구려와 당 최후의 전쟁 과정 복원 시론
한국사학보
2022 .02
-
고구려 멸망 직후 당의 고구려 故地 지배 시도와 유민의 동향
대구사학
2018 .01
-
요동지역 고구려성의 입지와 공간분석
한국고고학보
2023 .06
-
가야 諸國과 고구려의 관계
한국고대사연구
2020 .06
-
현도군위치 옥저지역설을 다시 검토한다 - 『삼국지』 사료비판 -
한국고대사연구
2021 .06
-
5세기 초·중반 동아시아 국제질서의 재편과 고구려의 외교정책
역사와현실
2022 .06
-
A Reconsideration of the Goguryeo Capital System
Korea Journal
2025 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-911-000839494