메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
정동준 (성균관대학교)
저널정보
역사비평사 역사비평 역사비평 2020년 가을호(통권 제132호)
발행연도
2020.8
수록면
329 - 362 (34page)
DOI
10.38080/crh.2020.08.132.329

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this article, as a characteristic of positive historiography, we presents a history book based on conventional wisdom, and analyzes how it appears in The Rise and Fall of Mimana(任那興亡史) written by Suematsu Yasukazu (末松保和), In addition to the positive historiography as a methodology, we found out what his historical view was like. In short, it is as follows. Although Suematsu’s conventional wisdom, which was revealed in the unproven descriptions of The Rise and Fall of Mimana, was based on the premise of Japan’s dominance over Baekje and Silla, and a huge Yamato regime which ruled the entire Japanese archipelago. It was as well as the limitations of the contemporary historical community, more likely to be the result of the reflection to the perception about Japan and Joseon during the Japanese colonial period, and the influence of the managing Southern Korea theory(南鮮經營說). Other than that, some of the effects of the theory of heteronomy were also revealed, and there were signs that seemed to have directly reflected modern diplomatic relations into ancient diplomatic relations. In the end, such historical view of Suematsu was simply a result of being faithful to quellenkritik and substantiation, but rather a result of being overly faithful to the contemporary conventional wisdom.

목차

1. 머리말
2. 실증사학의 특징과 식민주의 역사학
3. 『임나흥망사』에 보이는 증명 없는 서술
4. ‘통념’을 통해 분석한 스에마츠의 역사관
5. 맺음말
참고문헌

참고문헌 (33)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0