메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국법철학회 법철학연구 법철학연구 제11권 제2호
발행연도
2008.12
수록면
451 - 480 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper aims at pursuing a plausible theory of distributive justice based on equality by analyzing several competing theories of egalitarian justice. Each competing theory of equality, namely, equality of welfare, equality of resources, or equality of basic capabilities has its own distinctive justification and its particular collateral form of distributional equality. Equality of welfare espoused by utilitarians is to equalize people in welfare. Equality of resources vindicated by John Rawls and more deeply sophisticated by Ronald Dworkin is treating people equal by equalizing people in possessing resources as a means to access to welfare. Equality of basic capabilities developed by Amatya Sen and refined by Martha Nussbaum is equalizing people in basic functions and capabilities necessary for access to well-being. Although the idea that everybody should be equal in welfare is initially attractive but incurably problematic. Equality of welfare has defect because with respect to welfare to be equalized we will soon encounter that there are too many variety of meaning of welfare to plausibly equalize people in welfare. Also another objection to equality of welfare is that it mandates provision for expensive tastes: the objection is that it is unfair to impose the cost of satisfying a given person`s expensive taste on other people. Equality of basic capabilities has been criticized because it will soon be expanded to include higher level of capabilities, which entails in fusing with the realm of welfare. Equality of resources is regarded as a most powerful explication of the means to equalizing people. But nonetheless equality of resources also has been subject to criticism by G. A. Cohen and Richard Arneson under the slogan of equality of opportunity for welfare. Equality of resources is also criticized from the camp of Sen and Nussbaum since it tends to focus on the material satisfaction on the one hand but on the other hand it neglects a humanistic aspect for people truly in need of the sense of freedom trough the functioning and capabilities. However, on the whole theories of equality of resources can be regarded as an idea of equality which explains best both the principle of liberal choice and personal responsibility. Equality of resources is a means to realize the idea of liberal equality. Notwithstanding this merit on the part of equality of resources, equality of basic functioning capabilities should be taken into serious consideration in order to complement the deficiency of equality of resources. Equality of basic functioning capabilities play a role to provide a humanistic face by adding a basic functioning and basic capabilities which can not be fully realized only by the material satisfaction under the equality of resources. Thus my contention in this paper is that distributional equality would be better realized by the means of equality of resources with a condition that at the threshold level of decent standard of living the basic needs of the least advantaged people should be satisfied by employing the basic capabilities approach.
#기본적 능력의 평등 #분배적 평등의 실현형태 #Equality of Welfare #Forms of Distributional Equality #Measure of Equalization #복지의 평등 #자원의 평등 #Equality of Resources #평등화의 척도 #Equality of Basic Capabilities

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (41)

참고문헌 신청
Martha C. Nussbaum / 2007 / Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership / Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press google schola Ronald Dworkin / 2000 / Sovereign Virtue, The Theory and Practice of Equality / Harvard University Press google schola 로널드 드워킨 / 2005 / 자유주의적 평등 / 한길사 google schola Amartya Sen / 1980 / The Tanner Lectures on Human Values Vol. I / Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press ~197 google schola 오병선 / 1993 / 자유공동체주의의 정의론 / 사법행정 (385)~50 google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

존 롤즈(John Rawls)의 분배정의론과 한국적 적용에 대한 연구
정진화 한국정치학회보 2016 .06
분배정의와 평등 : 한국 정치에 있어서의 분배문제 해결을 위한 이론적 논의
張東震 한국정치학회보 1992 .04

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-360-001264565