지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제118호
- 발행연도
- 2020.12
- 수록면
- 331 - 379 (49page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2020.12.118.331
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The following three points can be found on how the socialist movement of colonial Korea in the mid-1930s accepted the anti-fascist popular front theory.
First, the Comintern raised the anti-fascist popular front theory and urged a national revolution appropriate to each country. The Comintern argued that communists should recognize popular nationalism and be an advocate of national culture. The acceptance of the anti-fascist popular front theory in Manchuria, symbolized by the Association for the Restoration of the Fatherland(조국광복회), was the result of acknowledging Korean nationalism, which was suppressed in the anti-Minsaengdan struggle. Yi Jae-yu’s interest in the history and culture of Korea is in line with the world-historical phenomenon of the rise of the nation faced by the socialist movement in the 1930s. Even in the activities of the Wonsan Group, there is a contemporaneous interest about whether to oppose or use the nationalism of Koreans.
Second, the popular front theory and the national unification front theory had an aspect of the logic of the anti-Japanese armed struggle. The popular front was the logic of camp and war. The anti-fascist popular front was realized only when the “front” of World War II became clear. The reason that Koreans in Manchuria exemplarily accepted the anti-fascist popular front theory and the national unification front theory was because of the anti-Japanese armed struggle, which is an semii-colonial Chinese way of movement. Even within colonial Korea, the popular front and the national unification front tend to be understood in relation to the armed struggle.
Third, the communist group of colonial Korea chose a method of activity appropriate to the colonial situation. Under the severe suppression of Japanese imperialism symbolized by Peace Preservation Law, the legal space was extremely shrunken, and it was difficult to expect the existence of a healthy national bourgeoisie that would form an axis of the national unification front. Several communist groups have been unable to abandon the old way of secrecy. The difference between the Association for the Restoration of the Fatherland in Manchuria which was active in solidarity with various forces, and the Korean National Liberation Alliance(한인민족해방동맹) in Gapsan which was passive about it, came from the difference between the Manchurian anti-Japanese armed struggle and the colonial secrecy movement.
First, the Comintern raised the anti-fascist popular front theory and urged a national revolution appropriate to each country. The Comintern argued that communists should recognize popular nationalism and be an advocate of national culture. The acceptance of the anti-fascist popular front theory in Manchuria, symbolized by the Association for the Restoration of the Fatherland(조국광복회), was the result of acknowledging Korean nationalism, which was suppressed in the anti-Minsaengdan struggle. Yi Jae-yu’s interest in the history and culture of Korea is in line with the world-historical phenomenon of the rise of the nation faced by the socialist movement in the 1930s. Even in the activities of the Wonsan Group, there is a contemporaneous interest about whether to oppose or use the nationalism of Koreans.
Second, the popular front theory and the national unification front theory had an aspect of the logic of the anti-Japanese armed struggle. The popular front was the logic of camp and war. The anti-fascist popular front was realized only when the “front” of World War II became clear. The reason that Koreans in Manchuria exemplarily accepted the anti-fascist popular front theory and the national unification front theory was because of the anti-Japanese armed struggle, which is an semii-colonial Chinese way of movement. Even within colonial Korea, the popular front and the national unification front tend to be understood in relation to the armed struggle.
Third, the communist group of colonial Korea chose a method of activity appropriate to the colonial situation. Under the severe suppression of Japanese imperialism symbolized by Peace Preservation Law, the legal space was extremely shrunken, and it was difficult to expect the existence of a healthy national bourgeoisie that would form an axis of the national unification front. Several communist groups have been unable to abandon the old way of secrecy. The difference between the Association for the Restoration of the Fatherland in Manchuria which was active in solidarity with various forces, and the Korean National Liberation Alliance(한인민족해방동맹) in Gapsan which was passive about it, came from the difference between the Manchurian anti-Japanese armed struggle and the colonial secrecy movement.
목차
1. 반파시즘 인민전선론 ‘불철저 수용론’을 넘어
2. 코민테른의 반파시즘 인민전선론
3. 만주 항일무장투쟁과 민족통일전선
4. 식민지에서 민족통일전선의 애로
5. 사회주의 운동의 식민지적 길
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (25)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
대한민국임시정부의 소비에트러시아 외교관계의 형성과 독립외교 전개 그리고 ‘비밀군사협정’
재외한인연구
2021 .06
-
인민전선론의 수용과 해석에 대한 재고― 톨리아티의 전쟁론과 원산적색노동조합 ―
이화사학연구
2024 .06
-
항일 무장 독립 투쟁사 학습에 대한 고등학생의 인식과 교수 방향
역사교육
2020 .09
-
1930년대 중반 한인민족해방동맹의 항일투쟁의 특징과 역사적 재평가
동북아역사논총
2016 .12
-
일제 말기 ‘파시즘적 교육’의 개념화 문제
역사교육
2023 .06
-
Communist Visions for Korea’s Future : The 1920-30s
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2017 .06
-
스탈린과 코민테른 제7차 대회의 기원
역사비평
2024 .11
-
1920년대 중반 코민테른과 민족통일전선? 1926년 3월 결정서에서 1927년 4월 결정서까지 ?
사림
2021 .10
-
1934년 2월 6일 ‘폭동’의 인식과 기념 : 프랑스 공화국의 위기에서 민족전선의 ‘창립신화(mythe fondateur)’로
코기토
2024 .10
-
초기 한인 사회주의 세력과 1921년 동방노력자공산대학 입학생
한국사학보
2025 .02
-
종전/해방 직후 남한에서의 간도 5·30 소환과 표상, 그리고 불안정성
역사학연구
2020 .01
-
1920년대 조선공산당의 민족개념과 ‘민족해방운동’의 성격
영남학
2024 .03
-
1920년대 在滿韓人社會主義者들의 항일투쟁 노선 변화
한국민족운동사연구
2017 .01
-
在朝鮮日本人浅川伯教 · 巧兄弟と柳宗悦の朝鮮伝統文化理解の特質 : 初期の活動を中心に
일본문화학보
2018 .11
-
『조선(朝鮮)の특산(特産)』으로 보는 일제강점기 식품 특산물 현황 분석
한국식생활문화학회지
2019 .01
-
1950~1960년대 북한의 ‘혁명전통’ 확립과정과 역사인식의 변화
역사와현실
2021 .03
-
조선인의 조선 연구 ― 코민테른의 1922년 12월 결정서 채택에 참여한 조선인들을 중심으로―
사림
2015 .01
-
재중 일본인 반전동맹의 조선 항일서사
아시아문화연구
2020 .04
-
동아시아 현대문학 속의 한국 항일영웅 서사
아시아문화연구
2017 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0