메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
강승일 (연세대)
저널정보
한국구약학회 구약논단 구약논단 제27권 제1호 통권79집
발행연도
2021.3
수록면
282 - 305 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
According to Mettinger, de facto aniconism refers to simply having no image, whereas programmatic aniconism refers to the prohibition of images. In particular, Mettinger identified two types of de facto aniconism, one of which is “empty-space aniconism.” This is the practice of leaving the space where God should be empty; expressing the presence of God with an empty space. This essay attempts to verify whether Mettinger’s empty-space aniconism really existed. This is necessary because the concept of empty-space aniconism is sometimes accepted uncritically in the field of iconographic studies. In terms of research methodology, this essay examines the Holy of Holies in Solomon’s Temple, the empty space in the Taanach Cult Stand, temple models, and throne models, which are commonly regarded as evidence of empty-space aniconism. This study concludes that the image of Yahweh God most likely existed within the Holy of Holies in the Solomonic Temple. It is wrong to interpret that the empty space in the second tier of the Taanach Cult Stand represents the invisible God. Considering that other cult stands also had windows or empty spaces, the empty space of the Taanach Cult Stand may have had a magical function or may have been related to a structural or aesthetic function.
In the case of the temple models, the empty space in them is more likely to represent the entrance, rather than representing the god with an empty space. The same goes for throne models. Most of the throne models are designed to allow a statue to be fixed on top. It is also possible that the throne model was a symbol of a god or an offering to a deity. The concept of empty-space aniconism proposed by Mettinger has tended to be uncritically accepted in academia until now. However, an in-depth analysis confirms that there is no evidence that clearly proves the existence of empty-space aniconism. Therefore, I argue that the concept of so-called “empty-space aniconism” as proposed by Mettinger is no longer viable.

목차

1. 서론
2. 솔로몬 성전의 지성소
3. 제의단
4. 신전 모형
5. 보좌 모형
7. 결론
8. 참고문헌

참고문헌 (26)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0