지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2019.8
- 수록면
- 1 - 74 (74page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Recently, as the interest in pedestrians’ safety has increased, walking trails have been developed around the country.
Since Seoul’s walking trail was constructed, the number of users has been steadily increasing as the usability and accessibility also increases. However, conflicts are frequently occurring between the local governments and landowners or users of walking trails, and are expected to increase after the implementation of the Abolition System in a Long-term unexecuted Urban Park in 2020. Efficient management methods are needed to proactively respond to complaints from landowners and users of trails. Therefore, this study focuses on the conflict cases that occurred in the trails of Seoul and analyzed the implications of the problems through similar internal and external cases, related systems and structures, and derived a solution for conflict management. First, related systems and management structure were examined. This study examined the concept of walking trails, management plan and how policies at the national or local government level were operated through research literature and media. Seminars were held by specialists to derive solutions and implications for similar conflict cases in Japan.
Second, the location, cause of conflict, and level of conflict were examined. For the section with specific location information, the surrounding land distribution and facilities were reviewed through GIS data and field survey.
Third, each case was analyzed in terms of the cause of conflict and person(s) concerned. We summarized the characteristics of the site with conflict cases. The conflict management system was deduced in consideration of the implications from the characteristics of conflict resolution. Conflict experts were reviewed and supplemented to make effective plans.
As a result, the conflict management methods were proposed based on compensation plan, conflict prevention management plan, and management system improvement plan. All conflict differ in nature because of different land characteristics and different surrounding conditions. Compensation should be made in consultation with landowners in consideration of regional characteristics, value in use and ecological environment. Therefore, the purchase cost and usage fee of the trail were calculated and the results used to select the criteria for consultation with landowner. In addition, 100% reduction of property tax was proposed to revitalize the green practical use contract. Conflict Impact Analysis is used to prevent conflict management to comprehend private land for major trails and the persons concerned, and predicted areas of conflict risk to enable local governments to respond in advance. Regarding management system improvement plan, manuals on walking trail use and conflict management should be prepared for safe use to prevent and systematically manage conflicts by sharing their management methods and procedures. Moreover, to efficiently manage conflict, we proposed ways to build conflict management cooperation system with citizens, corporations, organization, and experts.
Since Seoul’s walking trail was constructed, the number of users has been steadily increasing as the usability and accessibility also increases. However, conflicts are frequently occurring between the local governments and landowners or users of walking trails, and are expected to increase after the implementation of the Abolition System in a Long-term unexecuted Urban Park in 2020. Efficient management methods are needed to proactively respond to complaints from landowners and users of trails. Therefore, this study focuses on the conflict cases that occurred in the trails of Seoul and analyzed the implications of the problems through similar internal and external cases, related systems and structures, and derived a solution for conflict management. First, related systems and management structure were examined. This study examined the concept of walking trails, management plan and how policies at the national or local government level were operated through research literature and media. Seminars were held by specialists to derive solutions and implications for similar conflict cases in Japan.
Second, the location, cause of conflict, and level of conflict were examined. For the section with specific location information, the surrounding land distribution and facilities were reviewed through GIS data and field survey.
Third, each case was analyzed in terms of the cause of conflict and person(s) concerned. We summarized the characteristics of the site with conflict cases. The conflict management system was deduced in consideration of the implications from the characteristics of conflict resolution. Conflict experts were reviewed and supplemented to make effective plans.
As a result, the conflict management methods were proposed based on compensation plan, conflict prevention management plan, and management system improvement plan. All conflict differ in nature because of different land characteristics and different surrounding conditions. Compensation should be made in consultation with landowners in consideration of regional characteristics, value in use and ecological environment. Therefore, the purchase cost and usage fee of the trail were calculated and the results used to select the criteria for consultation with landowner. In addition, 100% reduction of property tax was proposed to revitalize the green practical use contract. Conflict Impact Analysis is used to prevent conflict management to comprehend private land for major trails and the persons concerned, and predicted areas of conflict risk to enable local governments to respond in advance. Regarding management system improvement plan, manuals on walking trail use and conflict management should be prepared for safe use to prevent and systematically manage conflicts by sharing their management methods and procedures. Moreover, to efficiently manage conflict, we proposed ways to build conflict management cooperation system with citizens, corporations, organization, and experts.
목차
[표지]
[요약]
2020년 도시공원 일몰제로 갈등 늘듯…선제적 갈등관리 방안 마련할 시점
다른 지자체도 등산로 갈등 발생…당사자 협의, 경제적 보상으로 주로 해결
갈등의 주원인은 토지소유자 등 이해관계자별 입장 차이, 사업·계획 대상지
재정적 보상, 땅주인과 협의 진행… 이용료 개념 적용한 비교선택 기준 제공
녹지활용계약이 활성화하도록 재산세 감면 등 세제혜택 기준 변경 바람직
갈등영향 분석 활용해 갈등확대 가능성이 높은 지역 중심으로 선제적 대응
등산로 이용·갈등관리체계 마련으로 이용객들의 불편·안전 불안 최소화해야
서울시, 시민·기업·전문가와 함께 등산로 관련 갈등관리 협력체계 구축 필요
[목차]
표 목차
그림 목차
[01. 연구개요]
1_연구배경 및 목적
2_연구내용 및 방법
[02. 국내외 관련제도 및 갈등사례 분석]
1_등산로 관련 제도 및 관리체계
2_등산로 갈등 관련 사례
3_국내외 갈등관리 활용 사례
[03. 서울시 등산로 갈등사례 분석]
1_서울시 등산로 갈등사례
2_갈등요인 분석
3_종합 및 시사점
[04. 등산로 갈등해소 방안]
1_등산로 보상 방안
2_등산로 갈등 예방적 관리방안
3_등산로 관리체계 보완 방안
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
[Contents]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
서울시 주요 등산로의 토지소유 갈등관리
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2019 .08
-
농업·농촌 분야 사회갈등 관리실태와 개선과제
한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서
2015 .10
-
지방자치단체 간 갈등 조정 방안 연구: 경기도 및 경상남도 사례를 중심으로
정책연구
2021 .11
-
Policy and Conflict
학술대회 발표논문집
2016 .06
-
지방자치단체간 공동사업 추진 과정에서의 갈등관리 특성분석 : 광역교통시설을 중심으로
한국지역개발학회지
2018 .03
-
Conflict in the Shadow of Conflict
[KDI] Journal of Economic Policy
2016 .11
-
지방정부의 공공갈등관리체제 구축을 위한 탐색적 연구
한국자치행정학보
2019 .01
-
특급호텔 식음료 및 조리종사자의 갈등유형이 조직유효성에 미치는 영향 : 부산지역을 중심으로
관광레저연구
2017 .02
-
Systematic literature review on emotional intelligence and conflict management
Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science(마케팅과학연구)
2022 .06
-
관광개발사업 갈등요인의 인과관계 분석: 송악산 관광개발사업을 대상으로
관광레저연구
2021 .02
-
공간적 구조에 따른 공공갈등의 영향범위 분석
한국비교정부학보
2021 .01
-
한국의 공공갈등 발생현황 및 해결방법에 관한 연구- 1948∼2014년 공공정책갈등사례 DB를 중심으로 -
한국정책학회보
2017 .01
-
분권화에 따른 지방정부 간 갈등의 다층성에 대한 연구
한국정책연구
2022 .06
-
북한의 사회 갈등에 대한 주민들의 인식: 정량적 접근
북한연구학회보
2021 .01
-
외식기업 종사자 갈등유형이 조직성과 및 자기효능감에 미치는 영향 연구
호텔리조트연구
2020 .01
-
A Empirical Analysis on Conflict Risk Perception in Local Public Corporations
Journal of Safety and Crisis Management
2021 .08
-
성공적 갈등관리를 위한 인공지능 활용 전략 연구
한국비교정부학보
2020 .01
-
공공갈등의 해결을 위한 갈등조정협의회의 구성과 절차에 관한 소고
한양법학
2024 .05
-
공공갈등관리시스템의 개선방안에 관한 연구
국가정책연구
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-359-001918201