메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
문소희 (계명문화대학교 뷰티코디네이션학부 겸임교수) 전소리 (서경대학교 미용예술대학 헤어·메이크업 디자인학과 외래교수**) 이재숙 (광주여자대학교 미용과학과 교수)
저널정보
한국인체미용예술학회 한국인체미용예술학회지 한국인체미용예술학회지 제21권 제4호
발행연도
2020.1
수록면
305 - 318 (14page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this research, we developed an evaluation tool for hair works, analyzed the level of development work design, and contributed to the development of hair work designs. The conclusions of this study are as follows. First, the evaluation criteria that are currently being conducted are extracted to compose questions and through beauty background surveys and expert questionnaires 26 questions were extracted. Second, the 26 questions in the questionnaire developed as a result of descriptive statistical analysis were judged by appropriate questions and found to have a normal distribution. Third, as a result of reliability analysis, the overall reliability value appeared very high at .993, and the reliability value for each sub-factor appeared relatively high at .824 to .967, and all 26 questions were trusted. I found that I could do it. Fourth, as a result of checking the suitability of the factor analysis model to investigate the structure of the factors of the measurement questions of the hair work design evaluation tool, a total of 12 questions were deleted and 14 questions were derived. The factor structure of the design evaluation tool was extracted by four factors (three questions for design shape, four questions for design color, four questions for design principles, and three questions for completeness of design). Fifth, the final 14 questions of the hair work design evaluation tool were properly constructed. As a result of correlation analysis, it was found that all of them had a significant positive (+) correlation. Sixth, as a result of scoring and presenting the evaluation results of the works based on the results of the analysis, work 1 was 80.35 and work 2 was 81.97 based on a maximum of 100 points. It was possible to know that the displayed and scaled questionnaire was properly constructed as well as the work evaluation level of the prior expert group. Seventh, as a result of conducting statistical analysis and technology for evaluating the completeness of the composition of questionnaire question items, an average of 4.07 appears, and the questionnaire respondents know that the content of the questionnaire is well organized. In this research, we developed an evaluation tool for hair works, analyzed the level of development work design, and contributed to the development of hair work designs.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (42)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0