메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김선옥 (원광대학교)
저널정보
한국현대영미소설학회 현대영미소설 현대영미소설 제26권 제2호
발행연도
2019.1
수록면
241 - 264 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper aims to explore the ambivalence in the representation of the flappers in The Great Gatsby focusing on Nick Carraway’s unreliability as the narrator and the gap it causes in his narration. The Great Gatsby is Fitzgerald’s masterpiece, in which the 1920s new women called flappers seem to be negatively represented on the surface. The main reason for this is that all of them are judged by the male narrator in a negative way about their morality. However, the text includes some gap or space where they can be interpreted differently from the narrator’s point of view. In other words, given Nick’s unreliability, except for the characters’ external behaviors and remarks, his judgement of them could be just his specific view or interpretation as a male character himself. From this point of view, the three main flapper characters, Daisy, Jordan, and Myrtle can be more objectively evaluated in the social context in women’s view, not just as “a rotten crowd” as Nick judged. Fitzgerald, a keen observer of the 1920s, contributed to spreading the image of the flappers to the public through all his novels revealing ambivalent attitude towards them. Even though it seems that Fitzgerald had more negative ideas about the flappers while writing The Great Gatsby, he still reveals his ambivalent attitude in representing them through the subtle narrative device, showing the possibility and limitations of the 1920s flappers as an emblem of women’s liberation.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (19)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0