메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이관수 (동국대학교) 이내주 (육군사관학교) 문지영 (숙명여자대학교) 박진희 (동국대학교)
저널정보
한국서양사연구회 서양사연구 서양사연구 제55호
발행연도
2016.1
수록면
5 - 46 (42page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The history of nuclear power production in the United States, the United Kingdoms, France and West Germany contradicts technological determinism. The reactor technology converged on the light water reactor, while their nuclear power regimes diverged quite differently. This historical development evades socio-economical factor analysis, since the historical contingencies and contexts of each nation played critical roles. Even nuclear engineers and scientists’ legitimate domain of expertise were dissimilar. Though the nuclear policy of United States conditioned the nuclear development of the UK, France, West Germany, the influences never were unidirectional. Especially, UK’s nuclear development propelled US to created then non-existent nuclear power plant program. At the end of 1960s, nuclear power production regimes in each nations were established. However, they were confronted with different problems. In the United States, the traditional arguments on “government vs private sector” took a new turn. Safety concern iginited quite a acerbic controversy. Both of the United Kingdoms and West Germany shared the expectations that nuclear power plant industry would be a healthy export industry, but that prospects were not bright, regardless of who controls the nuclear industry, the government(UK) or private sector(West Germany). France had finally caught-up the Anglo-American nuclear capacities, if not quantity. However how to realize France’s strong nationalistic vision remained an open question.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0