메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
아세아연합신학대학교 ACTS신학연구소 ACTS 신학저널 ACTS 신학저널 제29권
발행연도
2016.1
수록면
255 - 305 (51page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Multiculturalism can be approached from both an individualist and collectivist perspective. Multicultural individualists take a positive view of cultural mixing, think of cultures as open, take a pluralistic and critical approach to culture, and emphasise the uniqueness of individuals. By contrast, multicultural collectivists take a positive view of cultural separation, conceive of cultures in holistic and respectful terms, and stress the shared cultural traits of individuals. Multicultural individualism has been developed by thinkers including John Locke, Karl Popper and Martin Luther King. Multicultural collectivism has been developed by thinkers including Arthur De Gobineau, Malcolm X and Paul Yuzyk. The different policy implications of multicultural individualism and collectivism are seen in the contested policy of transracial adoption. Multicultural collectivism has been criticised for its separatist agenda and its tendency to excuse violations of human rights on cultural grounds. Arguments against multiculturalism contributed to the success of the leave campaign in the EU referendum, although paradoxically, leave campaigners have themselves adopted a form of multicultural collectivism. This is seen in the current Brexit debate, where a soft Brexit is associated with individualism, a hard Brexit with national-level collectivism. Multicultural collectivism has become controversial, in part, because it has not pursued an integrationist agenda. At the same time, undocumented migrants and asylum seekers grants in the UK are being deliberately isolated rather than integrated. The question of how issues concerning these migrants can be approached is considered with respect to education and to policy advocacy—where churches have a significant role. In both cases it is seen as advantageous to help students or the public to think of migrants as individuals, rather than as an abstract mass. This approach is in accordance with the principles of multicultural individualism and of Christianity.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0