지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article discusses the division of images (eidōla) presented in Sophist, and explores how the sophist’s verbal deception is made based on this division. In Sophist, the Eleatic Stranger distinguishes between two types of images: likenesses (eikones) and apparitions (phantasmata). If the likeness is an image that actually resembles the original, the apparition is an image that does not actually resemble the original but appears to resemble it. How exactly should this distinction be understood? Cornford’s argument that the distinction between likenesses and apparitions is made according to the ‘degree of reality’ leads to the conclusion that Plato uses the concept of ‘image’ inconsistently. Bluck criticizes Cornford on the grounds that likenesses and apparitions are both related to falsehood as branches of images. This criticism is reasonable but does not help us to understand the distinction. According to Notomi, given the metaphysical distinction between reality and appearance, if the likeness is a correct image that truly resembles the original and represents its appearance, then the apparition is an incorrect image that only appears to resemble it by points of view. I basically agree with Notomi’s view, but his interpretation does not accurately reveal the falsehood particular to the apparition, nor does it accurately account for the deception of sophists, other than painters. It is because, according to Notomi’s interpretation, apparitions will appear as likenesses, i.e., they will represent the same appearance as likenesses even in the ‘unbeautiful point of view.’ This, contrary to Notomi’s assertion that the apparition is an incorrect image, seems to allow for the possibility that it can represents ‘true appearances.’ Moreover, unlike painters, the deception of sophists occurs when the original is not well known, and therefore it is difficult for the observer to determine which is a likeness, that is, when he does not know which image represents true appearances. For this reason, I argue that the falsehood particular to the apparition arise on the one hand by accidental resemblance irrelevant of the essence of the original and, on the other hand, by aesthetic and emotional effect. Thus, the sophist’s verbal deception can be achieved by stimulating the emotions of the audience with flashy rhetoric unrelated to the truth, and by imitating the appearance of a wise person in terms of performing discourses. Furthermore, the deception of the sophist can be discriminated into two types, according to the view on the relation between language and Forms.
목차
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Review of existing literature
3. Conditions of deceptions
4. The Division of images
5. The verbal deception of sophists
Bibliography
참고문헌 (22)
참고문헌 신청
Anchepe, I. M. / 2017 / ¿EXISTEN LOS FANTASMAS? SOBRE IMAGEN (EIDOLON) Y CONOCIMIENTO EN EL SOFISTA DE PLATON / Praxis Filosófica 44:37~58
Benardete, S. / 2008 / The Being of the Beautiful: Plato’s Theaetetus, Sophist, and Statesman / The University of Chicago Press
Bluck, R. S. / 1975 / Plato’s Sophist: A Commentary / Manchester University Press
Brann, E. / 1996 / Plato: Sophist: The Professor of Wisdom / Focus Publishing
Brown, L. / 2010 / Definition in Greek philosophy / Oxford University Press :151~171
Benardete, S. / 2008 / The Being of the Beautiful: Plato’s Theaetetus, Sophist, and Statesman / The University of Chicago Press
Bluck, R. S. / 1975 / Plato’s Sophist: A Commentary / Manchester University Press
Brann, E. / 1996 / Plato: Sophist: The Professor of Wisdom / Focus Publishing
Brown, L. / 2010 / Definition in Greek philosophy / Oxford University Press :151~171
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Two Kinds of Truth and Falsehood in Plato’s Sophist
서양고전학연구
2021 .12
-
Plato’s Perfect Sophist: Diotima and Likeness (eikōn)
서양고전학연구
2024 .12
-
Images of Wisdom in the Prologue of Plato’s Sophist
서양고전학연구
2021 .12
-
Speeches as Images of Being: Phaedo 99d4-100a8 and Sophist 254d4-256e7
서양고전학연구
2021 .12
-
Plato’s Perfect Sophist: The Clarification Inferred
동서철학연구
2020 .01
-
플라톤의 『소피스트』에서 소피스트의 정의(定義)
서양고전학연구
2022 .09
-
Is Socrates in Plato’s Sophist a Sophist?
철학논총
2024 .07
-
제2의 변명으로서의 플라톤 『향연』: 소피스트와의 겨룸과 진지한 유희의 측면에서 읽기
철학연구
2023 .06
-
재난에 대처하는 법
새한영어영문학
2023 .05
-
4차 산업혁명 사회 속 이미지에 대한 현상학적 연구 -메를로-퐁티의 현상학을 토대로-
대동철학
2018 .09
-
『알렉산더 수사학』과 아리스토텔레스의 『수사학』
철학논총
2015 .04
-
죄를 묻는 시선과 주체의 자기기만 - 이청준의 「병신과 머저리」를 중심으로 -
우리말글
2023 .06
-
｢모험｣에 나타난 자기기만과 외로움
영미문화
2018 .01
-
고골의 희곡들에 나타난 기만과 자기기만의 시학:『결혼』, 『검찰관』, 『도박꾼들』을 중심으로
러시아어문학연구논집
2016 .01
-
아서 밀러의 『시련』: 레비나스의 타자철학을 통해 본 동일성의 유령과 타자의 마녀화
현대영어영문학
2016 .01
-
대순사상에서 무자기의 상생적 의미 : 칸트, 밀, 베르그송 윤리학 논의와의 비교를 중심으로
대순사상논총
2024 .09
-
「필경사 바틀비」의 경제와 증여
새한영어영문학
2022 .05
-
A Shellfish on the Path of Truth: Funny Images and the Modulation of Pleasure and Pain
서양고전학연구
2021 .12
-
속임수 전략으로 읽는 솔로몬의 재판
신학연구
2023 .12
-
비유의 단위에 대하여
한국시학연구
2019 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-800-000120078