지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제122호
- 발행연도
- 2021.12
- 수록면
- 175 - 207 (33page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2021.12.122.175
이용수
DBpia Top 10%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Jeong Do-jeon is recorded in the Annals of the Taejo era in Joseon(Taejo Shillok) as the biggest contributor to the task of founding the Joseon dynasty. References to his meritorious actions have also been acknowledged as a historical fact by many modern studies. Interestingly, however, records of his contribution may have been credited to him by an unexpected group of people: no other than the members of the very faction which opposed and eventually eliminated Jeong Do-jeon.
For a long time, Jeong Do-jeon remained in close relationships with many officials including Jeong Mong-ju, who favored the preservation of the Goryeo dynasty. And history actually does ‘not’ show him very much in action or in positions to engage in plans to bring down Goryeo and found a new dynasty instead.
He did sever his ties with Jeong Mong-ju and others around 1390, and cooperated with the faction determined to build a new dynasty, but during the time right before Joseon’s foundation, he was still actually in exile. Also, while Jo Jun and others –who had been engaged in efforts to replace Goryeo with Joseon- returned to the central political arena right after Jeong Mong-ju’s assassination, Jeong Do-jeon was recalled from his exile only two months later, and even after the recall, he was not given any meaningful task.
In the last years of Goryeo and the early years of Joseon, Neo-Confucianism became the dominant ideology in the philosophical community, and any meritorious deed performed in replacing an existing dynasty with a new one was actually deemed as a crime that went against Neo-Confucian causes and morality. In other words, bigger the meritorious deeds in founding the Joseon dynasty were, also bigger was the treachery committed to a dynasty to which one belonged. Anyone tagged with such dishonor would be immediately considered as an individual whose actions should not be emulated. So, the people who successfully engineered the change of state -and also survived the power struggles in the early years of Joseon-, actually spared themselves from philosophical scolding, by imposing the image of a traitor on Jeong Do-jeon, saying that he was the biggest contributor to the fall of Goryeo and rise of Joseon.
For a long time, Jeong Do-jeon remained in close relationships with many officials including Jeong Mong-ju, who favored the preservation of the Goryeo dynasty. And history actually does ‘not’ show him very much in action or in positions to engage in plans to bring down Goryeo and found a new dynasty instead.
He did sever his ties with Jeong Mong-ju and others around 1390, and cooperated with the faction determined to build a new dynasty, but during the time right before Joseon’s foundation, he was still actually in exile. Also, while Jo Jun and others –who had been engaged in efforts to replace Goryeo with Joseon- returned to the central political arena right after Jeong Mong-ju’s assassination, Jeong Do-jeon was recalled from his exile only two months later, and even after the recall, he was not given any meaningful task.
In the last years of Goryeo and the early years of Joseon, Neo-Confucianism became the dominant ideology in the philosophical community, and any meritorious deed performed in replacing an existing dynasty with a new one was actually deemed as a crime that went against Neo-Confucian causes and morality. In other words, bigger the meritorious deeds in founding the Joseon dynasty were, also bigger was the treachery committed to a dynasty to which one belonged. Anyone tagged with such dishonor would be immediately considered as an individual whose actions should not be emulated. So, the people who successfully engineered the change of state -and also survived the power struggles in the early years of Joseon-, actually spared themselves from philosophical scolding, by imposing the image of a traitor on Jeong Do-jeon, saying that he was the biggest contributor to the fall of Goryeo and rise of Joseon.
목차
머리말
1. 이방석 세자 책봉 관련 기록 검토
2. 왕조 교체 관련 기록 검토
맺음말 - 왕조 개창의수훈(首勳)과 성리학 명분 배반 덧씌우기
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (14)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
고려말의 신분 질서와 정도전의 왕조 교체 세력 합류
역사와현실
2019 .06
-
14세기 정도전의 유교입국론
동양고전연구
2020 .01
-
한시에 투영된 포은 숭모와 문학적 형상화 양상
포은학연구
2016 .01
-
谷口園 鄭象觀의 『史記』 애호와 그 의의 -｢讀馬史｣ 및 南漢朝와의 왕복 서한을 중심으로-
한국한문학연구
2024 .08
-
도선(道詵)의 예언서와 정경(鄭經), 그리고 정진인
일본문화학보
2019 .08
-
나주정씨 가문의 대원군 집권기(1863~1873) 살아내기
민족문화
2025 .03
-
정몽주의 신화화와 역사소비
역사와현실
2019 .03
-
임고서원 소장 한두공 제작(1735년) 정몽주 영정 소개
포은학연구
2019 .01
-
정약전론의 전개과정과 쟁점 ―정약전과 천주교 (1)―
교회사연구
2022 .12
-
송시열의 춘추사상과 정몽주 추숭의 의의
포은학연구
2016 .01
-
정도전의 불교 비판에서 『맹자』의 영향과 성리학에 대한 이해
대동철학
2018 .06
-
고려후기 정몽주의 불교이해
한국철학논집
2018 .01
-
一蠹 鄭汝昌의 사상과 문학 -문집의 편찬과 간행을 중심으로-
동방한문학
2022 .12
-
Exploring the Role of Jeong (情) as a Cultural Concept in Modern Organization
Korea Observer
2016 .01
-
‘조선’ 국호로 본 여말선초의 역사인식과 이상국가론
역사와현실
2018 .06
-
여말선초 성리학의 수용과 그 성격
역사비평
2018 .02
-
인조~현종대 정몽주 인식
포은학연구
2019 .01
-
여선교체, 정치사상의 변화
한국사상사학
2024 .04
-
『경제문감(經濟文鑑)』 재상 편의 『고금원류지론(古今源流至論)』인용
한국사연구
2020 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0