메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
한희승 (서울대학교)
저널정보
19세기영어권문학회 19세기 영어권 문학 19세기 영어권 문학 제26권 제1호
발행연도
2022.3
수록면
61 - 88 (28page)
DOI
10.24152/NCLE.2022.3.26.1.61

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article claims that George Eliot’s idea of sympathy requires the deconstruction of the Subject and that Latimer, in “The Lifted Veil,” fails to sympathize with others because he tries to hold on to his power as the Subject. Eliot’s “The Lifted Veil” is considered a problematic novel in her oeuvre, since it seems to contradict her belief that the major role of art is to expand readers’ sympathy. Although Latimer’s telepathic ability allows him to gain an insight into other people’s minds, it does not lead him to the sympathy that is expected of readers. While critics have attributed this to Latimer’s inability to maintain his “double consciousness,” this article argues that it is because of the double consciousness that Latimer cannot move away from his egoistic self and reach the other. Moreover, as double consciousness is a crucial concept in Eliot’s idea of sympathy, examining Latimer’s failed sympathy in terms of his double consciousness helps us rethink how Eliot conceptualizes the ethics of sympathy. In order to understand what double consciousness means in Eliot’s theory of sympathy, I first read Ludwig Feuerbach’s The Essence of Christianity closely, which had a major influence on Eliot’s ideas. Second, I analyze the conflict between Latimer’s ability to dissolve the boundaries of time, space, and the subject and his desire to retain the boundaries of his subjectivity. Finally, I look at Latimer’s egocentric reading of Bertha’s character and argue that Eliot’s idea of sympathy is based not on similarity but on difference. The article demonstrates that Latimer’s torments reflect the reading experience, which seeks to expand readers’ sympathy; by delineating his suffering, Eliot sends readers the message that sympathy is a painful process involving the splitting up of subjectivity.

목차

I. 서론: “두 가지 의식”을 갖춘 래티머의 공감 실패
II. 신에게서 사랑으로: 포이어바흐의 주체와 공감
III. 래티머의 능력과 욕망의 충돌: 상상력의 두 가지 작동방식
IV. 차이를 바탕으로 하는 공감: 완벽한 타자인 버사 읽기
V. 결론: 공감으로 향하는 독서 경험
인용문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-840-001172561