메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이정희 (인천대학교)
저널정보
동양사학회 동양사학연구 東洋史學硏究 第158輯
발행연도
2022.3
수록면
327 - 365 (39page)
DOI
10.17856/jahs.2022.3.158.327

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article is to review Anti-Chinese riots of Haiphong(ACRH) with a ‘Min-Guo Shi-liu-Nian Ba-yi-qi Yue-nan Hai-phang Can-sha Hua-qiao An-ji’[民國十六年 八一七越南海防慘殺華僑案紀] which was published by Guangzhou Office of Chinese Kuomintang’s Central Committee in 1928. The results of these review are as follows. Firstly, ACRH began from a quarrel between a Chinese lady and a Vietnamese lady at a city water fountain near the Haiphong Chinatown in August 17, 1927. The quarrel spread to two people’s local residents, neighbors, and passers-by. Overseas Chinese community in Haiphong and Nanking Nationalist Government argued that French Colonial Government of Indochina(FCGI) hesitated to calm down the dispute early not to get worse matters. whereas FCGI did not agree. In addition, Overseas Chinese community in Haiphong regarded ACRH as a Vietnamese unilateral violence on Chinese, while FCGI viewed ACRH as damages caused by clashes between Vietnamese and Chinese. According to the Chinese material, 12 Chinese were killed and 88 were injured, whereas FCGI identified 15 dead and 60 wounded, One of deaths was Vietnamese. We can guess that ACRH was developed as a unilateral violence by Vietnamese from a point of view to consider the degree of damage comprehensively. In particular, it is proved that 100 Chinese who owned shops and houses were looted and suffered massive property losses on August 20th in Haiphong Chinatown. Secondly, Vietnamese perceived Chinese as unwelcome as they were economically superior to Vietnamese and only took care of their own interests. This was another cause. FCGI is wary that the economic power of overseas Chinese will threaten French capital and Chinese government and they will influence Vietnamese independence activities. Prior to the outbreak of ACRH, Vietnamese political groups and business circles were carrying out a campaign called the “Chinese Product Exclusion Movement” against the strong economic activities of overseas Chinese. Thirdly, the Nanking Nationalist Government tried to resolve ACRH diplomatically through the French Consulate in Guangzhou. Apart from this trial, Cantong and Guangxi provincial government also requested Chinese protection toward Chinese central government and the French Consulate with Cantong and Guangxi branch of Chinese Kuomintang. However, these diplomatic attempts ended in failure as FCGI perceived to handle the incident properly and suppress it well. Fourthly, the Haiphong Branch of Chinese Kuomintang played a great role to carry out Chinese protection against Vietnamese riots, investigate the victims, and release the Chinese from detention. However, Cantonese and Fukienese congregations were not able to get actively involve resolving ACRH as the congregations was a subordinate of FCGI. Vietnamese political groups appealed the solidarity between Vietnamese and Chinese not to influence the cooperation from Chinese government and the Chinese Kuomintang with ACRH.
#프랑스령 인도차이나 #베트남화교 #하이퐁 화교 배척 사건 #하이퐁 화인가 #중국국민당하이퐁지부 #난징국민정부 #法属印度支那政府 #越南华侨 #海防排华事件 #海防华人街 #中国国民党海防支部 #南京国民政府 #French Colonial Government of Indochina #Overseas Chinese in Vietnam #Anti-Chinese riots in Haiphong #Haiphong Chinatown #Haiphong Branch of Chinese Kuomintang #Nanking National Government

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 하이퐁 화교 배척 사건 발발의 경위와 전개
Ⅲ. 하이퐁 화교사회와 중국의 중앙 및 지방정부의 대응
Ⅳ. 베트남인 정치단체의 사건 인식과 대응
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청
참고문헌이 DBpia에서 서비스 중이라면, [참고문헌 신청]을 통해 등록해보세요

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-910-001302948